FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number 1-5672
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
|
State of Indiana
|
|
13-5158950 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
4 West Red Oak Lane, White Plains, NY 10604
(Principal Executive Office)
Telephone Number: (914) 641-2000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange
Act). Yes o No
þ
As of April 30, 2006, there were outstanding
184,964,896 shares of common stock ($1 par value per
share) of the registrant.
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited consolidated condensed financial
statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) and, in the opinion of management, reflect all
adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments)
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules. The
Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make
the information presented not misleading. Certain amounts in the
prior periods consolidated condensed financial statements
have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation. These financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto
included in the Companys 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENTS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Sales and revenues
|
|
$ |
1,886.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,765.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of sales and revenues
|
|
|
1,383.5 |
|
|
|
1,296.4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
270.3 |
|
|
|
262.9 |
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
Restructuring and asset impairment charges, net
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,711.6 |
|
|
|
1,622.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
175.1 |
|
|
|
143.9 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Miscellaneous expense, net
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense
|
|
|
153.6 |
|
|
|
133.0 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
46.1 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
107.5 |
|
|
|
121.4 |
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, including tax
expense (benefit) of $7.4 and $(3.1), respectively
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
155.9 |
|
|
$ |
116.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Earnings Per
Share(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Average Common Shares Basic
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
Average Common Shares Diluted
|
|
|
187.8 |
|
|
|
188.5 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Restated for two-for-one stock split effective February 21,
2006. |
The accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements are an integral part of the above income statements.
3
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
623.8 |
|
|
$ |
451.0 |
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
1,317.3 |
|
|
|
1,268.1 |
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
707.0 |
|
|
|
661.3 |
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256.9 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,824.2 |
|
|
|
2,780.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, property, and equipment, net
|
|
|
829.3 |
|
|
|
837.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
87.5 |
|
Goodwill, net
|
|
|
2,284.8 |
|
|
|
2,249.1 |
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
210.4 |
|
|
|
214.8 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
985.4 |
|
|
|
894.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
4,399.9 |
|
|
|
4,282.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
7,224.1 |
|
|
$ |
7,063.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
816.8 |
|
|
$ |
797.2 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
785.5 |
|
|
|
745.8 |
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
167.4 |
|
|
|
187.1 |
|
|
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
819.5 |
|
|
|
751.4 |
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,597.2 |
|
|
|
2,567.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
|
|
|
431.7 |
|
|
|
428.3 |
|
Postretirement benefits other than pensions
|
|
|
303.7 |
|
|
|
305.5 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
514.4 |
|
|
|
516.3 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
515.9 |
|
|
|
522.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,765.7 |
|
|
|
1,772.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,362.9 |
|
|
|
4,340.0 |
|
Shareholders
Equity:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 250,000,000 shares, $1 par value per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding: 185,126,301 shares and 184,637,920 shares
|
|
|
184.7 |
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,785.3 |
|
|
|
2,666.0 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on investment securities and cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(120.4 |
) |
|
|
(120.4 |
) |
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(108.8 |
) |
|
|
(127.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,861.2 |
|
|
|
2,723.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
7,224.1 |
|
|
$ |
7,063.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Restated for
two-for-one stock split
effective February 21, 2006. |
The accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements are an integral part of the above balance sheets.
4
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
155.9 |
|
|
$ |
116.5 |
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(48.4 |
) |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
107.5 |
|
|
|
121.4 |
|
Adjustments to income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
|
|
Amortization of stock compensation
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
Restructuring and asset impairment charges, net
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
Payments for restructuring
|
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
Change in receivables
|
|
|
(40.3 |
) |
|
|
(82.5 |
) |
|
Change in inventories
|
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
Change in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
55.4 |
|
|
Change in accrued and deferred taxes
|
|
|
(29.7 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
Change in other current and non-current assets
|
|
|
(113.2 |
) |
|
|
(110.5 |
) |
|
Change in non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash operating activities
|
|
|
(43.0 |
) |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to plant, property, and equipment
|
|
|
(29.7 |
) |
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses
|
|
|
225.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash investing activities
|
|
|
170.3 |
|
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt, net
|
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
179.3 |
|
Long-term debt repaid
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Long-term debt issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(68.8 |
) |
|
|
(82.4 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(16.6 |
) |
|
|
(33.2 |
) |
Other, net
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash financing activities
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate Effects on Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Net Cash Discontinued Operations Operating
Activities
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Net Cash Discontinued Operations Investing
Activities
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
172.8 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
451.0 |
|
|
|
262.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$ |
623.8 |
|
|
$ |
336.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$ |
75.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements are an integral part of the above cash flow
statements.
5
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
1) Receivables, Net
Net receivables consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Trade
|
|
$ |
1,216.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,157.4 |
|
Other
|
|
|
133.2 |
|
|
|
148.8 |
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts and cash discounts
|
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
(38.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,317.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,268.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) Inventories, Net
Net inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Finished goods
|
|
$ |
177.3 |
|
|
$ |
158.8 |
|
Work in process
|
|
|
283.5 |
|
|
|
268.8 |
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
331.8 |
|
|
|
316.3 |
|
Less: progress payments
|
|
|
(85.6 |
) |
|
|
(82.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
707.0 |
|
|
$ |
661.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) Plant, Property, and Equipment, Net
Net plant, property, and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Land and improvements
|
|
$ |
58.5 |
|
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
498.4 |
|
|
|
490.7 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
1,428.2 |
|
|
|
1,412.0 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
|
224.7 |
|
|
|
224.5 |
|
Construction work in progress
|
|
|
68.9 |
|
|
|
70.3 |
|
Other
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,344.0 |
|
|
|
2,318.4 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(1,514.7 |
) |
|
|
(1,481.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
829.3 |
|
|
$ |
837.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
4) Sales and Revenues and Costs of Sales and Revenues
Sales and revenues and costs of sales and revenues consist of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Product sales
|
|
$ |
1,507.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,421.8 |
|
Service revenues
|
|
|
379.7 |
|
|
|
344.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales and revenues
|
|
$ |
1,886.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,765.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of product sales
|
|
$ |
1,071.7 |
|
|
$ |
998.2 |
|
Costs of service revenues
|
|
|
311.8 |
|
|
|
298.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs of sales and revenues
|
|
$ |
1,383.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,296.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Defense Electronics & Services segment comprises
$352.8 and $312.4 of total service revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $289.7 and
$272.1 of total costs of service revenues, respectively, during
the same periods. The Fluid Technology segment comprises the
remaining balances of service revenues and costs of service
revenues.
5) Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax | |
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
Income | |
|
(Expense) |
|
Net-of-Tax | |
|
|
(Expense) | |
|
Benefit |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
155.9 |
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments (refer to table below)
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
174.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax | |
|
Tax | |
|
|
|
|
Income | |
|
(Expense) | |
|
Net-of-Tax | |
|
|
(Expense) | |
|
Benefit | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116.5 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
(66.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(66.4 |
) |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities and cash flow
hedges
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(66.6 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
(66.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of 2006 Foreign Currency Translation
Reclassification:
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
|
$ |
34.9 |
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
7
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
6) Earnings Per
Share(1)
The following is a reconciliation of the shares used in the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding used in the
computation of basic earnings per share
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
Common stock equivalents
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
187.8 |
|
|
|
188.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 1,214,888 shares of common stock at an
average price of $50.04 per share were outstanding at
March 31, 2006 but were not included in the computation of
diluted EPS, because the options exercise prices were
greater than the average market price of the common shares.
These options expire in 2013.
Options to purchase 3,546,280 shares of common stock at an
average price of $45.46 per share were outstanding at
March 31, 2005 but were not included in the computation of
diluted EPS, because the options exercise prices were
greater than the average market price of the common shares.
These options expire in 2012.
There were no antidilutive restricted common stock excluded from
the computation of diluted EPS for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. The amount of antidilutive restricted
shares of common stock excluded from the computation of diluted
EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was
insignificant.
|
|
(1) |
Restated for
two-for-one stock split
effective February 21, 2006. |
7) Stock-Based and Long-Term Incentive Employee
Compensation
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004)
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) as
of January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method
described in the accounting standard. SFAS 123R requires
the cost of stock options issued as equity awards to be measured
at fair value on the grant date and recognized in the income
statement. The Companys Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements as of and for the three months ended March 31,
2006 reflect the impact of SFAS 123R. In accordance with
the modified prospective transition method, the Companys
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for prior periods
have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the
impact of SFAS 123R.
The total stock-based
compensation cost recognized in income for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $7.6 and $4.5, respectively.
The total tax benefit related thereto was $2.7 and $1.6,
respectively. Total compensation costs capitalized was
immaterial for both periods. The incremental stock-based
compensation caused net income to decrease by $2.2 and basic and
diluted earnings per share to decrease by $0.1 per share.
Cash provided by operating activities decreased and cash
provided by financing activities increased by $7.4 related to
excess tax benefits from stock options.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated
Condensed Income Statement for the first quarter of fiscal 2006
is based on awards ultimately expected to vest. Accordingly,
expense has been reduced for estimated forfeitures.
SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time
of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if
actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. In the
Companys
8
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
pro forma information required under SFAS 123R for the
periods prior to fiscal 2006, the Company accounted for
forfeitures as they occurred.
Awards granted to retirement eligible employees prior to
January 1, 2006 were fully vested on the date of grant but
were expensed over the expected service period. Under the
provisions of SFAS 123R, compensation expense for the
awards to retirement eligible employees would have been
recognized immediately. As of March 31, 2006, there was
$7.3 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these
awards. In 2006, the Company modified its vesting conditions for
stock option awards to align the vesting period with the service
period for all employees, including retirement eligible
employees. The Company will continue to recognize compensation
expense for all stock-based awards ratably over the expected
service period under the provisions of SFAS 123R.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company applied
APB 25 to account for its stock-based awards. The following
table details the effect on net income and diluted net income
per share had compensation expense for the employee stock-based
awards been recorded in the first quarter of 2005 based on the
fair value method under SFAS 123R:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
Net income as reported for the prior
period(1)
|
|
$ |
116.5 |
|
Add: Share-based employee compensation expense, net of tax
benefit, included in net income as
reported(2)
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Less: Total share-based employee compensation expense, net of
tax benefit, that would have been included in net income if the
fair value method had been applied to all awards
(2)(3)
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, including the effect of stock-based compensation
expense(4)
|
|
$ |
113.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
As reported for the prior
period(1)
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
Including the effect of stock-based compensation expense
(4)
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
Diluted earnings per share
As reported for the prior
period(1)
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
Including the effect of stock-based compensation expense
(4)
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Net income and net income per share does not include stock-based
compensation expense for employee stock options under
SFAS 123R because the Company did not adopt the recognition
provisions of SFAS 123R. |
|
(2) |
Share-based employee compensation expense excludes the
compensation cost recognized for the Companys long-term
incentive plan as this plan was not accounted for under the
provisions of SFAS 123R. |
|
(3) |
Stock-based compensation expense is calculated based on the pro
forma application of SFAS 123R. |
|
(4) |
Net income and net income per share represents pro forma
information based on SFAS 123R. |
At March 31, 2006, the Company has one stock-based employee
compensation plan that is issuing new options and restricted
shares of common stock. The Company has one stock-based employee
compensation plan and two stock-based non-employee
directors compensation plans that have options and
restricted shares outstanding, but will not be issuing
additional stock-based compensation. The Company also has one
long-term incentive plan for certain eligible levels of
management.
9
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
|
|
|
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Compensation
Plans |
The Companys stock option and restricted share award
incentive plans provide for the awarding of options on common
shares and restricted common shares to employees. The options
are exercisable over seven to ten-year periods, except in
certain instances of death, retirement or disability. Certain
options become exercisable upon the earlier of the attainment of
specified market price appreciation of the Companys common
shares or at six or nine years after the date of grant. Other
options become exercisable upon the earlier of the attainment of
specified market price appreciation of the Companys common
shares or over a three-year period commencing with the date of
grant. The exercise price per share is the fair market value on
the date each option is granted. Restricted shares typically
vest over a three-year period commencing on the date of grant.
The Company makes shares available for the exercise of stock
options or the vesting of restricted shares by purchasing shares
in the open market or by issuing shares from Treasury. The
Company has a policy of repurchasing shares on the open market
to offset the dilutive impact of stock option exercises.
The 2003 Equity Incentive Plan was established in May of 2003.
This plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock
units. The number of shares initially available for awards under
this plan was 12,200,000. As of March 31, 2006,
3,908,367 net shares were available for future grants.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, the
Company awarded 388,597 and 12,000 restricted shares,
respectively, to employees with weighted average restriction
periods of 3.0 and 3.5 years, respectively.
The 2003 Equity Incentive Plan replaces the 2002 ITT Industries
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, the ITT Industries
1996 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors and the
1994 ITT Industries Incentive Stock Plan on a prospective basis.
All awards granted under these prior plans will continue to vest
and be exercisable in accordance with their original terms;
however, no future grants will be made from these prior plans.
A summary of the status of the Companys stock option and
restricted stock compensation plans as of March 31, 2006
and changes during the quarter then ended is presented below
(shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Stock Options | |
|
Restricted Shares(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
13,143 |
|
|
$ |
32.88 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
$ |
50.13 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
$ |
52.68 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
$ |
52.68 |
|
Exercised/vested
|
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
$ |
25.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or expired
|
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
$ |
29.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2006
|
|
|
11,666 |
|
|
$ |
34.92 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
$ |
51.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2006
|
|
|
8,613 |
|
|
$ |
30.55 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the
period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)The
table above excludes 250,000 restricted stock units that were
granted at a fair value of $41.52. The unrecognized compensation
cost associated with these units is $7.4. This cost is expected
to be recognized ratably over 4.25 years.
10
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
The intrinsic value of options (which is the amount by which the
stock price exceeded the exercise price of the options on the
date of exercise) exercised during the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $75.0 and $43.6, respectively.
The outstanding restricted shares include 25,384 shares
issued to non-employee directors in payment of the annual
retainer for non-employee directors. This cost is expected to be
recognized ratably over a weighted average period of
3.7 years. For the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the
amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was
$36.9 with an associated tax benefit realized of $14.4.
The following table summarizes information about the
Companys stock options at March 31, 2006 (shares and
aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Intrinsic | |
|
|
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Intrinsic | |
Range of Exercise Prices | |
|
Number | |
|
Life | |
|
Price | |
|
Value | |
|
Number | |
|
Life | |
|
Price | |
|
Value | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ |
12.44 - 16.66 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
2.7 years |
|
|
$ |
15.61 |
|
|
$ |
36,700 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
2.7 years |
|
|
$ |
15.61 |
|
|
$ |
36,700 |
|
17.41 - 19.78 |
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
4.1 years |
|
|
|
18.86 |
|
|
|
38,892 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
4.1 years |
|
|
|
18.86 |
|
|
|
38,892 |
|
25.33 - 29.29 |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
5.8 years |
|
|
|
25.41 |
|
|
|
34,939 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
5.8 years |
|
|
|
25.41 |
|
|
|
34,939 |
|
30.91 - 34.56 |
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
6.8 years |
|
|
|
30.99 |
|
|
|
36,636 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
6.8 years |
|
|
|
30.99 |
|
|
|
36,636 |
|
37.46 - 41.52 |
|
|
2,476 |
|
|
|
7.9 years |
|
|
|
37.88 |
|
|
|
37,038 |
|
|
|
2,476 |
|
|
|
7.9 years |
|
|
|
37.88 |
|
|
|
37,038 |
|
42.00 - 45.47 |
|
|
3,335 |
|
|
|
5.9 years |
|
|
|
45.44 |
|
|
|
24,684 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
6.0 years |
|
|
|
45.45 |
|
|
|
7,803 |
|
47.41 - 52.68 |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
6.8 years |
|
|
|
52.21 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.73 - 57.46 |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
6.4 years |
|
|
|
54.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
209,299 |
|
|
|
8,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
192,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents
the total pretax intrinsic value, based on the Companys
closing stock price of $56.22 as of March 31, 2006, which
would have been received by the option holders had all option
holders exercised their options as of that date. The total
number of in-the-money
options exercisable as of March 31, 2006 is
8.6 million. As of March 31, 2005, 11.3 million
outstanding options were exercisable, and the weighted average
exercise price was $23.99.
At March 31, 2006, there was $59.1 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested awards granted under the
stock option and restricted stock plans. This cost is expected
to be recognized ratably over a weighted-average period of
2.3 years.
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of
grant using the binomial lattice pricing model. The following
weighted-average assumptions for grants in 2006 and 2005 were:
dividend yield of 0.84% and 0.79%, respectively; expected
volatility of 24.0% and 23.0%, respectively; expected life of
4.8 years and 4.6 years, respectively; and risk-free
interest rates of 4.72% and 4.00%, respectively. The weighted
average grant date fair value of options granted during the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005 was
$14.12 and $11.12, respectively.
Expected volatilities are based on the Companys stock
price history, including implied volatilities from traded
options on the Companys stock. The Company uses historical
data to estimate option exercise and employee termination
behavior within the valuation model. Separate employee groups
and option characteristics are considered separately for
valuation purposes. The expected life represents an estimate of
the period of time options are expected to remain outstanding.
The expected life provided above represents the weighted average
of expected behavior for certain groups of employees who have
historically exhibited different behavior. The risk-free rate is
based on the US Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
option grant.
11
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
The ITT Industries 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
LTIP), approved by shareholders in 1997, authorizes
performance awards to be made to key employees of ITT
Industries. The LTIP is considered a liability plan, under the
provisions of SFAS 123R. Accordingly, the Company is
required to reassess the fair value of its LTIP awards at the
end of each reporting period.
Payment, if any, of target cash awards generally will be made at
the end of the applicable three-year performance period and will
be based on ITT Industries performance measured against
the total shareholder return performance of other stocks
comprising the S&P Industrials Index.
The fair value of each award is calculated on a quarterly basis
using Monte Carlo simulations. The three year volatility of the
outstanding awards as of March 31, 2006 was approximately
17.38%. The number of companies included in the applicable
benchmark group range from 339 to 368 for the awards outstanding
as of March 31, 2006.
At March 31, 2006, there was $40.8 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested awards granted under the
long-term incentive plan. This cost is expected to be recognized
ratably over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years. The
total cash paid to settle the LTIP liability during the first
quarter was $17.2 and $16.1 in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
8) Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges
|
|
|
2006 Restructuring Activities |
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company recognized a $15.8
restructuring charge. New actions represent $12.8 of the charge
and costs related to previous plans comprise $3.0 of the charge.
The actions announced during 2006 by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The Fluid Technology segment recorded $2.3 of severance costs
associated with the elimination of 122 positions including
86 factory workers, 30 office workers and six management
employees. Other costs totaled $1.6 and primarily reflect other
employee benefit costs, and employee relocation costs. The
charges reflect the continued reduction in structural costs,
including the closure of two facilities. Additional severance
costs of $1.2 will be recognized during the remainder of 2006
related to these actions. |
|
|
|
The Electronic Components segment recorded $4.9 of severance
costs related to the elimination of 77 positions, including 42
factory workers, and 35 office workers. These charges reflect
the structural realignment of the segment. |
|
|
|
The Defense Electronics & Services segment recorded
$2.0 of severance costs for the elimination of
60 positions, including three factory workers, 44 office
workers and 13 management employees. These charges reflect the
reduction of structural costs. |
|
|
|
The Motion & Flow Control segment recorded $0.7 of severance
costs reflecting the elimination of 125 positions,
including 107 factory workers, 16 office workers and two
management employees. Asset write-offs associated with the
charges were $1.2. The charges reflect the closure of one
facility and the reduction of structural costs. Additional
severance costs of $0.8 will be recognized during the remainder
of 2006 related to these actions. |
|
|
|
Corporate headquarters recorded a charge of $0.1 for the
elimination of the position of one office worker. |
12
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
The Company also recognized $1.5 of severance cost in the
Electronic Components segment related to actions announced prior
to 2006. Additionally, the segment incurred $0.6 of other costs
associated with previously announced actions.
The Fluid Technology segment recorded $0.4 of other costs and
$0.1 of severance costs associated with previously announced
plans.
The Motion & Flow Control segment recorded $0.2 of
other costs and $0.2 of amortized severance costs associated
with previously announced actions.
|
|
|
2005 Restructuring Activities |
During 2005, the Company recognized a $71.1 restructuring
charge. New actions represent $69.8 of the charge. Costs
associated with previous year plans represent $1.3 of the charge.
The actions announced during 2005 by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The Fluid Technology segment recorded $28.8 of severance costs
for the elimination of 466 positions, including 236 factory
workers, 207 office workers and 23 management employees. Lease
cancellation and other costs were $0.9 and $0.8, respectively.
Additionally, asset write-offs totaling $1.4 were also recorded.
The charges reflect a reduction in structural costs, including
the closure of four facilities. |
|
|
|
The Electronic Components segment recorded $25.8 for the
elimination of 1,246 positions, including 926 factory workers,
286 office workers and 34 management employees. Other costs
totaling $1.9, primarily representing contract termination
costs, lease costs, and other were also recognized during the
year. Asset write-offs associated with the restructuring actions
totaled $0.1. These actions reflect the continued reorganization
of the segment, including the closure of three facilities. |
|
|
|
The Motion & Flow Control segment recognized $8.9 for
the elimination of 274 positions, including 163 factory workers,
97 office workers and 14 management employees. Other costs
totaling $0.6 and lease costs of $0.2 were also recognized
during the year. The headcount reductions relate to workforce
reductions, the consolidation of functions, the transfer of
functions from France to Holland, and the outsourcing of
selected functions to Eastern Europe. |
|
|
|
Corporate headquarters recorded $0.4 for the elimination of one
management position. |
|
|
|
2005 Other Asset Impairments |
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company determined that
certain businesses within the Electronic Components segment were
experiencing lower than expected financial results and as a
result certain long-lived assets of those businesses may be
impaired. After revising the earnings forecast for these
businesses to reflect current business conditions, the Company
recorded an impairment charge of $8.3 relating to the long-lived
assets. These events and circumstances also caused the Company
to record an impairment charge for goodwill relating to the same
business unit. See Note 13, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, for
further discussion of the goodwill impairment charge.
13
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
The following table displays a rollforward of the cash
restructuring accruals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense | |
|
Motion | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluid | |
|
Electronics | |
|
& Flow | |
|
Electronic | |
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
Technology | |
|
& Services | |
|
Control | |
|
Components | |
|
and Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
32.6 |
|
Additional charges for prior year plans
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Payments and other related to prior charges
|
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
Reversals of prior charges
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
2006 charges
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Payments and other related to the 2006 charges
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2006
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
28.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005, the accrual balance for restructuring
activities was $32.6. Cash payments of $18.1 and additional cash
charges of $14.6 were recorded in the first quarter of 2006.
Also, management reviewed the Companys remaining
restructuring actions and determined actions totaling $0.7 would
be completed for less than planned. Accordingly, restructuring
accruals totaling $0.7 were reversed into income during the
first quarter of 2006. The accrual balance at March 31,
2006 is $28.4, which includes $25.0 for severance and $3.4 for
facility carrying costs and other.
As of December 31, 2005, remaining actions under
restructuring activities announced in 2005 were to reduce
positions by 218. During 2006, the Company announced the planned
reduction of 385 positions and reduced headcount by 249 leaving
a balance of 354 planned reductions. The Company also announced
the planned closure of three facilities during 2006. Actions
announced during 2006 and 2005 will be completed during 2006.
|
|
9) |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
The nature of the Companys business activities necessarily
involves the management of various financial and market risks,
including those related to changes in interest rates, currency
exchange rates, and commodity prices. As discussed more
completely in Note 1, Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, and Note 18, Financial
Instruments, within the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of the 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K, the
Company uses derivative financial instruments to mitigate or
eliminate certain of those risks.
A reconciliation of current period changes contained in the
accumulated other comprehensive loss component of
shareholders equity is not required as no material
activity occurred during the first three months of 2006 and
2005. Additional disclosures required by SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended, are presented below.
|
|
|
Hedges of Future Cash Flows |
There were no foreign currency cash flow hedges outstanding as
of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
Hedges of Recognized Assets, Liabilities and Firm
Commitments |
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company terminated
interest rate swaps that were entered into to manage the
interest rate exposure associated with certain long-term debt,
which effectively converted much of the long-term debt mentioned
in Note 16 Debt, within the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements of
14
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
the 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K from
fixed to variable rate borrowings. The fair value of these
instruments at the time of termination was $69.5, which will be
amortized into income over the remaining terms of the underlying
debt, which mature at various dates through 2025. At
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the remaining
balance to be accreted into income was $67.5 and $68.7,
respectively.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company
had foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts of
$118.3 and $120.5, respectively, to hedge the value of
recognized assets, liabilities and firm commitments. The fair
value of the 2006 and 2005 contracts were $0.0 and $0.1 at
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
The ineffective portion of changes in fair values of such hedge
positions reported in operating income during the first three
months of 2006 and 2005 was $(0.1) and $0.1, respectively. There
were no amounts excluded from the measure of effectiveness.
The fair values associated with the foreign currency contracts
have been valued using the net position of the contracts and the
applicable spot rates and forward rates as of the reporting date.
|
|
10) |
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, which requires that goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested for impairment on
an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances warrant.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006, by business segment, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense | |
|
Motion | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluid | |
|
Electronics | |
|
& Flow | |
|
Electronic | |
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
Technology | |
|
& Services | |
|
Control | |
|
Components | |
|
and Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
$ |
1,040.8 |
|
|
$ |
947.3 |
|
|
$ |
163.8 |
|
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,249.1 |
|
Goodwill acquired during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
Other, including foreign currency translation
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2006
|
|
$ |
1,052.8 |
|
|
$ |
971.0 |
|
|
$ |
164.0 |
|
|
$ |
92.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,284.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill of $21.1 as of December 31, 2005 is excluded from
the table above and is reflected in current assets of
discontinued operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2005. The businesses to which it relates were
sold during the first quarter of 2006.
Information regarding the Companys other intangible assets
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Finite-lived intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Relationships
|
|
$ |
139.5 |
|
|
$ |
138.8 |
|
|
Proprietary Technology
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
Patents and other
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(50.2 |
) |
|
|
(40.3 |
) |
Indefinite-lived intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brands and trademarks
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
Pension related
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intangibles
|
|
$ |
210.4 |
|
|
$ |
214.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the three
month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $6.1 and
$4.6, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding
years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23.0 |
|
|
$ |
20.2 |
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
|
|
11) |
Discontinued Operations |
At March 31, 2006, the Company had automotive discontinued
operations accruals of $34.4 that are primarily related to
product recalls of $7.8, environmental obligations of $14.0 and
employee benefits of $12.6.
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company completed the sale of
its automotive brake & fuel tubing and components
business to a privately held company, for net proceeds of
$198.9 million. The business, which was a component of the
Companys Motion & Flow Control segment,
manufactures steel and plastic tubing for fuel and brake lines,
quick-connects, and serves the transportation industry.
Additionally, during the first quarter of 2006, the Company
completed the sale of its industrial non-metallic lined pumps
and valves business to a private equity investor, for net
proceeds of $21.9 million. The business, which was a
component of the Companys Fluid Technology segment, is a
leading manufacturer of pumps and valves for selected segments
in the chemical, fine chemical, and pharmaceutical industries.
The Company recognized gains on these two transactions totaling
approximately $46.5 million.
Revenues associated with the disposed discontinued operations
were $455.7 in 2005.
12) Pension and Postretirement Medical Benefit Expenses
The components of net periodic pension cost consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Components of net periodic pension cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
24.6 |
|
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
70.6 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(93.3 |
) |
|
|
(89.8 |
) |
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
22.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension expense increased in the first quarter of
2006 as a result of the lower discount rate adopted at year end
2005 leading to a higher amortization of actuarial losses offset
by lower average foreign exchange rates and higher expected
returns on plan assets due to higher plan asset balances.
The Company contributed approximately $107.2 to its various
plans during the first quarter of 2006 including a $100.0
discretionary contribution to its U.S. plans. Additional
contributions totaling between $13.0 and $33.0 are expected over
the balance of 2006.
16
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
The components of net periodic postretirement cost consist of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Components of net periodic postretirement cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
Amortization of prior service benefit
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement cost
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic expense decreased in the first quarter of 2006 as a
result of recognition of the impact of the Medicare
Modernization Act (MMA) and higher expected returns
on plan assets due to higher plan asset balances offset by the
effect of lower discount rates adopted at year end 2005.
On December 8, 2003, the MMA was signed into law. The
MMA introduced a prescription drug benefit under Medicare
(Medicare Part D) that provides several options for
Medicare eligible participants and employers, including a
federal subsidy to companies, effective January 1, 2006,
that elect to provide a retiree a prescription drug benefit
which is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare
Part D. There were significant uncertainties regarding the
eventual regulations required to implement the MMA as well as
the MMAs overall effect on plan participants
coverage choices and the related impact on their health care
costs which were, in part, answered by regulations issued in
2005. The Company has now determined that a majority of
its healthcare plans pass the test of actuarial
equivalence and during the fourth quarter of 2005 made
application to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
for the subsidy provided under the Act. The MMA subsidy will
reduce the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation for the
subject plans by approximately $41.0 at December 31, 2005
and the net periodic benefit cost was reduced by $1.4 in the
first quarter of 2006. Other than the effect of the subsidy,
there was no expectation that retiree participation would be
affected in the short-term given the nature of the
Companys healthcare plans.
See Note 19, Employee Benefit Plans, in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the 2005 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for
discussion of postretirement benefits.
|
|
13) |
Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company and its subsidiaries are from time to time involved
in legal proceedings that are incidental to the operation of
their businesses. Some of these proceedings allege damages
against the Company relating to environmental liabilities,
employment and pension matters, government contract issues and
commercial or contractual disputes, sometimes related to
acquisitions or divestitures. The Company will continue to
vigorously defend itself against all claims. Accruals have been
established where the outcome of the matter is probable and can
be reasonably estimated. Although the ultimate outcome of any
legal matter cannot be predicted with certainty, based on
present information including the Companys assessment of
the merits of the particular claim, as well as its current
reserves and insurance coverage, the Company does not expect
that such legal proceedings will have any material adverse
impact on the cash flow, results of operations or financial
condition of the Company on a consolidated basis in the
foreseeable future.
17
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
The Company has accrued for environmental remediation costs
associated with identified sites consistent with the policy set
forth in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies. in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of the 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. In
managements opinion, the total amount accrued and related
receivables are appropriate based on existing facts and
circumstances. It is difficult to estimate the total costs of
investigation and remediation due to various factors, including
incomplete information regarding particular sites and other
potentially responsible parties, uncertainty regarding the
extent of contamination and the Companys share, if any, of
liability for such conditions, the selection of alternative
remedies, and changes in
clean-up standards. In
the event that future remediation expenditures are in excess of
amounts accrued, management does not anticipate that they will
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In the ordinary course of business, and similar to other
industrial companies, the Company is subject to extensive and
changing federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws
and regulations. The Company has received notice that it is
considered a potentially responsible party (PRP) at
a limited number of sites by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and/or a similar state
agency under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or
Superfund) or its state equivalent. As of
March 31, 2006, the Company is responsible, or is alleged
to be responsible, for approximately 56 ongoing environmental
investigation and remediation sites in various countries. In
many of these proceedings, the Companys liability is
considered de minimis. At March 31, 2006, the Company
calculated a best estimate of $93.0, which approximates its
accrual, related to the cleanup of soil and ground water. The
low range estimate for its environmental liabilities is $67.4
and the high range estimate for those liabilities is $149.2. On
an annual basis the Company spends between $8.0 and $11.0 on its
environmental remediation liabilities. These estimates, and
related accruals, are reviewed periodically and updated for
progress of remediation efforts and changes in facts and legal
circumstances. Liabilities for environmental expenditures are
recorded on an undiscounted basis.
The Company is involved in an environmental proceeding in
Glendale, California relating to the San Fernando Valley
aquifer. The Company is one of numerous PRPs who are alleged by
the EPA to have contributed to the contamination of the aquifer.
In January 1999, the EPA filed a complaint in the United States
District Court for the Central District of California against
the Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation, United
States v. ITT Industries, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corp.
CV99-00552 SVW AIJX, to recover costs it incurred in
connection with the foregoing. In May 1999, the EPA and the
PRPs, including the Company and Lockheed Martin, reached a
settlement, embodied in a consent decree, requiring the PRPs to
perform additional remedial activities. Pursuant to the
settlement, the PRPs, including the Company, have constructed
and are operating a water treatment system. The operation of the
water treatment system is expected to continue until 2013. ITT
and the other PRPs continue to pay their respective allocated
costs of the operation of the water treatment system and the
Company does not anticipate a default by any of the PRPs which
would increase its allocated share of the liability. As of
March 31, 2006, the Companys accrual for this
liability was $9.9 representing its best estimate; its low
estimate for the liability is $6.5 and its high estimate is
$15.4.
ITT Corporation operated a facility in Madison County, Florida
from 1968 until 1991. In 1995, elevated levels of contaminants
were detected at the site. Since then, ITT has completed the
investigation of the site in coordination with state and federal
environmental authorities and is in the process of evaluating
various remedies. A remedy for the site has not yet been
selected. Currently, the estimated range for the remediation is
between $4.4 and $18.3. The Company has accrued $7.0 for this
matter, which approximates its best estimate.
18
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
The Company is involved with a number of PRPs regarding property
in the City of Bronson, Michigan operated by a former subsidiary
of ITT Corporation, Higbie Manufacturing, prior to the time ITT
acquired Higbie. The Company and other PRPs are investigating
and remediating discharges of industrial waste which occurred in
the 1930s. The Companys current estimates for its
exposure are between $6.5 and $13.9. It has an accrual for this
matter of $10.1 which represents its best estimate of its
current liabilities. The Company does not anticipate a default
on the part of the other PRPs.
In a suit filed in 1991 by the Company, in the California
Superior Court, Los Angeles County, ITT Corporation,
et al. v. Pacific Indemnity Corporation
et al., against its insurers, the Company is seeking
recovery of costs it incurred in connection with its
environmental liabilities including the three listed above.
Discovery, procedural matters, changes in California law, and
various appeals have prolonged this case. Currently, the matter
is before the California Court of Appeals from a decision by the
California Superior Court dismissing certain claims of the
Company. The dismissed claims were claims where the costs
incurred were solely due to administrative (versus judicial)
actions. A hearing is expected in 2006. In the event the appeal
is successful, the Company will pursue the administrative claims
against its excess insurers. During the course of the
litigation, the Company has negotiated settlements with certain
defendant insurance companies and is prepared to pursue its
legal remedies where reasonable negotiations are not productive.
|
|
|
Product Liability and Other Matters: |
The Company and its subsidiary Goulds Pumps, Inc.
(Goulds) have been joined as defendants with
numerous other industrial companies in product liability
lawsuits alleging injury due to asbestos. These claims stem
primarily from products sold prior to 1985 that contained a part
manufactured by a third party, e.g., a gasket, which
allegedly contained asbestos. The asbestos was encapsulated in
the gasket (or other) material and was non-friable. In certain
other cases, it is alleged that former ITT companies were
distributors for other manufacturers products that may
have contained asbestos.
Frequently, the plaintiffs are unable to demonstrate any injury
or do not identify any ITT or Goulds product as a source of
asbestos exposure. During 2005, ITT and Goulds resolved in
excess of 16,000 claims through settlement or dismissal. The
average amount of settlement per plaintiff has been nominal and
substantially all defense and settlement costs have been covered
by insurance. Based upon past claims experience, available
insurance coverage, and after consultation with counsel,
management believes that these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
The Company is involved in two actions, Cannon Electric, Inc.
et al. v. Ace Property & Casualty Company
(ACE) et al. Superior Court, County of Los
Angeles, CA., Case No. BC 290354, and Pacific
Employers Insurance Company et al., v. ITT Industries,
Inc., et al., Supreme Court, County of New York, N.Y., Case
No. 03600463. The parties in both cases are seeking an
appropriate allocation of responsibility for the Companys
historic asbestos liability exposure among its insurers. The
California action is filed in the same venue where the
Companys environmental insurance recovery litigation has
been pending since 1991. The New York action has been stayed in
favor of the California suit. ITT and ACE and Nationwide
Indemnity have successfully resolved the matter and the Company
is working with other parties in the suit to resolve the matter
as to those insurers. In addition, Utica National and Goulds are
negotiating a coverage in place agreement to allocate the
Goulds asbestos liabilities between insurance policies
issued by Utica and those issued by others. The Company is
continuing to receive the benefit of insurance payments during
the pendency of these proceedings. The Company believes that
these actions will not materially affect the availability of its
insurance coverage and will not have a material adverse effect
on the Companys consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
19
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
The Company is one of several defendants in a suit filed in
El Paso, Texas, Irwin Bast et al. v. ITT
Industries et al., Sup. Ct., El Paso, Texas, C.A.
No. 2002-4730. This Complaint, filed by both U.S. and
German citizens, alleges that ITT and four other major companies
failed to warn the plaintiffs of the dangers associated with
exposure to x-ray radiation from radar devices. The Complaint
also seeks the certification of a class of similarly injured
persons. In late 2005, the Court dismissed the Bund zur
Unterstutzung Radargeschadigter from the case and also dismissed
all claims relating to medical monitoring. Numerous other
motions are currently pending before the Court. A hearing on
class certification is expected in 2006. On October 5,
2004, the Company filed an action, ITT Industries, Inc.
et al. v. Firemans Fund Insurance Company
et al., Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, C.A. No.
B.C. 322546, against various insurers who issued historic
aircraft products coverage to the Company seeking a declaration
that each is liable for the costs of defense of the El Paso
matter. The parties have resolved this matter whereby the
Company will receive 82.5% of the cost of defense of this matter
from these insurers. The Company is pursuing other insurers for
the remaining costs. Management believes that the El Paso
suit will not have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
The Company provides an indemnity to U.S. Silica for silica
personal injury suits against its former subsidiary Pennsylvania
Glass Sand filed prior to September 12, 2005. ITT sold
the stock of Pennsylvania Glass Sand to U.S. Silica in
1985. The Companys indemnity had been paid in part by its
historic product liability carrier, however, in September 2005,
the carrier communicated to ITT that it would no longer pay a
share of the costs. On October 4, 2005, ITT filed a suit
against its insurer, ITT v. Pacific Employers Insurance
Co., CA No. 05CV 5223, seeking its defense costs and
indemnity from the carrier for Pennsylvania Glass Sand
product liabilities. That suit has been stayed in favor of one
filed by ACE in New York. [Ace Fire Underwriters Insurance
Company, et al., v. ITT Industries, Inc., et al.,
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York,
Index No. 600133/06] All silica related costs, net of
insurance recoveries, are shared pursuant to the Distribution
Agreement. See Company History and Certain
Relationships within Part I, Item 1 of the 2005
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for a
description of the Distribution Agreement. Management believes
that these matters will not have a material adverse effect on
the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Our Defense Electronics & Services company is subject
to the export control regulations of the U.S. Department of
State and the Department of Commerce. Currently, the
U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Virginia is
investigating ITT Night Visions compliance with
International Traffic in Arms Regulations. The Company is
cooperating with the investigation and recently, with the
Governments consent, it began its own investigation of
Night Visions compliance with the federal laws utilizing
outside counsel. Data and information derived from the
investigation is shared with the U.S. Attorney. The Company
will continue to assist the Government in its investigation,
however at this time, it is not possible to predict the outcome
of the investigation or what action, if any, the Government may
take at the conclusion of the investigation.
|
|
14) |
Guarantees, Indemnities and Warranties |
In September of 1998, the Company completed the sale of its
automotive electrical systems business to Valeo SA for
approximately $1,700. As part of the sale, the Company provided
Valeo SA with representations and warranties with respect to the
operations of the Business, including: Conveyance of Title,
Employee Benefits, Tax, Product Liability, Product Recall,
Contracts, Environmental, Intellectual Property, etc. The
Company also indemnified Valeo SA for losses related to a
misrepresentation or breach of the representations and
warranties. With a few limited exceptions, the indemnity periods
within which Valeo SA may assert new claims have expired. Under
the terms of the sales contract, the original maximum potential
liability to Valeo
20
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
SA on an undiscounted basis is $680. However, because of the
lapse of time, or the fact that the parties have resolved
certain issues, at March 31, 2006 the Company has an
accrual of $7.8 which is its best estimate of the potential
exposure.
In September of 1998, the Company completed the sale of its
brake and chassis unit to Continental AG for approximately
$1,930. As part of the sale, the Company provided Continental AG
with representations and warranties with respect to the
operations of that Business, including: Conveyance of Title,
Employee Benefits, Tax, Product Liability, Product Recall,
Contracts, Environmental, Intellectual Property, etc. The
Company also indemnified Continental AG for losses related to a
misrepresentation or breach of the representations and
warranties. With a few limited exceptions, the indemnity periods
within which Continental AG may assert new claims have expired.
Under the terms of the sales contract, the original maximum
potential liability to Continental AG on an undiscounted basis
is $950. However, because of the lapse of time, or the fact that
the parties have resolved certain issues, at March 31, 2006
the Company has an accrual of $14.0 which is its best estimate
of the potential exposure.
Since its incorporation in 1920, the Company has acquired and
disposed of numerous entities. The related acquisition and
disposition agreements contain various representation and
warranty clauses and may provide indemnities for a
misrepresentation or breach of the representations and
warranties by either party. The indemnities address a variety of
subjects; the term and monetary amounts of each such indemnity
are defined in the specific agreements and may be affected by
various conditions and external factors. Many of the indemnities
have expired either by operation of law or as a result of the
terms of the agreement. The Company does not have a liability
recorded for the historic indemnifications and is not aware of
any claims or other information that would give rise to material
payments under such indemnities. The Company has separately
discussed material indemnities provided within the last ten
years.
The Company provided a performance bond guarantee in the amount
of $10.0 related to its real estate development activities in
Flagler County, Florida. The Company would be required to
perform under this guarantee if certain parties did not satisfy
all aspects of the development order, the most significant
aspect being the expansion of a bridge. The maximum amount of
the undiscounted future payments equals $10.0. At March 31,
2006, the Company has an accrual related to the expansion of a
bridge in the amount of $10.0.
In December of 2002, the Company entered into a sales-type lease
agreement for its corporate aircraft and then leased the
aircraft back under an operating lease agreement. The Company
has provided, under the agreement, a residual value guarantee to
the counterparty in the amount of $44.8, which is the maximum
amount of undiscounted future payments. The Company would have
to make payments under the residual value guarantee only if the
fair value of the aircraft was less than the residual value
guarantee upon termination of the agreement. At March 31,
2006, the Company does not believe that a loss contingency is
probable and therefore does not have an accrual recorded in its
financial statements.
The Company has a number of individually immaterial guarantees
outstanding at March 31, 2006, that may be affected by
various conditions and external forces, some of which could
require that payments be made under such guarantees. The Company
does not believe these payments will have any material adverse
impact on the cash flow, results of operations or financial
condition of the Company on a consolidated basis in the
foreseeable future.
Accruals for estimated expenses related to warranties are made
at the time products are sold or services are rendered. These
accruals are established using historical information on the
nature, frequency, and average cost of warranty claims. The
Company warrants numerous products, the terms of which vary
widely. In general, the Company warrants its products against
defect and specific nonperformance. At March 31, 2006, the
Company has a product warranty accrual in the amount of $49.5.
21
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
Product Warranty Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
Changes in Pre-Existing |
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
Warranties Issued |
|
Warranties Including |
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
January 1, 2006 |
|
in the Period |
|
Changes in Estimates |
|
(Payments) |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
(6.3 |
) |
|
$ |
49.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
Changes in Pre-Existing |
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
Warranties Issued |
|
Warranties Including |
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
January 1, 2005 |
|
in the Period |
|
Changes in Estimates |
|
(Payments) |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38.5 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.7 |
) |
|
$ |
38.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company spent $23.7 for
the acquisition of a company within the Defense Electronics
& Services segment. The Company has preliminarily assigned
values to the assets and liabilities of the company, however,
the allocation is subject to further refinement.
16) Business Segment Information
Unaudited financial information of the Companys business
segments for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Motion | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense | |
|
& | |
|
|
|
|
Fluid | |
|
Electronics & | |
|
Flow | |
|
Electronic | |
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
Technology | |
|
Services | |
|
Control | |
|
Components | |
|
and Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Sales and revenues
|
|
$ |
685.7 |
|
|
$ |
831.1 |
|
|
$ |
188.3 |
|
|
$ |
185.0 |
|
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
$ |
1,886.7 |
|
Operating income (expense)
|
|
$ |
63.3 |
|
|
$ |
95.8 |
|
|
$ |
35.9 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
(27.4 |
) |
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
Segment operating margin
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,559.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,009.8 |
|
|
$ |
537.2 |
|
|
$ |
509.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,607.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,224.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Defense | |
|
Motion & | |
|
|
|
|
Fluid | |
|
Electronics & | |
|
Flow | |
|
Electronic | |
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
Technology | |
|
Services | |
|
Control | |
|
Components | |
|
and Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Sales and revenues
|
|
$ |
630.1 |
|
|
$ |
775.7 |
|
|
$ |
190.0 |
|
|
$ |
173.7 |
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,765.9 |
|
Operating income (expense)
|
|
$ |
54.6 |
|
|
$ |
77.8 |
|
|
$ |
31.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
(21.2 |
) |
|
$ |
143.9 |
|
Segment operating margin
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,491.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,816.5 |
|
|
$ |
525.1 |
|
|
$ |
766.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,868.0 |
|
|
$ |
7,467.1 |
|
|
|
17) |
Quarterly Financial Periods |
The Companys 2006 quarterly financial periods end on the
last day of the quarter or on the Saturday after the last day of
the quarter, except for the last quarterly period of the fiscal
year, which ends on December 31st. During 2005, the
Companys quarterly financial periods ended on the Saturday
after the last day of the quarter, except for the last quarterly
period of the fiscal year, which ended on December 31st.
For simplicity of presentation, the quarterly financial
statements included herein are presented as ending on the last
day of the quarter.
22
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In millions, except share and per share, unless otherwise
stated)
Item 2.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
Business Overview
The business overview provides information on the Companys
four principal operating segments: Fluid Technology, Defense
Electronics & Services, Motion & Flow Control
and Electronic Components, including their markets served, goods
and services provided, relevant factors that could impact
results, business challenges and areas of focus and selected
financial data. This section also provides a forecast of the
Companys 2006 consolidated results. The Company forecasts
consolidated revenues for 2006 to be between $7.9 billion
and $8.0 billion. Segment operating margin for 2006 is
forecasted to be between 12.2% and 12.3%.
Fluid Technology
Fluid Technology is a leading global provider of fluid systems
and solutions. Markets served and goods and services provided
include: Residential & Commercial Water (pumps and
accessories for residential, municipal and commercial
applications), Building Trades (products for environmental
control in buildings and for building services), Wastewater
Handling (submersible pumps and mixers for sewage and wastewater
treatment facilities), Treatment (biologicalozoneUV treatment
systems for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment), and
Industrial & BioPharm (pumpsvalves for the industrial,
mining, chemical, pulp and paper/solutions for process modules,
skid systems and stainless steel vessels.)
Factors that could impact Fluid Technologys financial
results include: broad economic conditions in markets served,
weather conditions, the ability of municipalities to fund
projects, raw material prices and continued demand for
replacement parts and servicing. Primary areas of business focus
include: new product development, geographic expansion into new
markets, facility rationalization and global sourcing of direct
material purchases. The Company forecasts revenues for the Fluid
Technology segment to be between $2.96 billion and
$3.00 billion with an operating income margin rate of 13.0%
to 13.1%.
Defense Electronic & Services
Defense Electronics & Services develops, manufactures,
and supports high technology electronic systems and components
for worldwide defense and commercial markets as well as provides
communications systems, engineering and applied research.
Defense Electronics & Services consists of six value
centers; Advanced Engineering & Sciences, Aerospace
Communications Division, Electronic Systems, Night Vision,
Systems Division, and Space Systems Division. These value
centers develop and support solutions for four major markets:
Communications, Sensors, Space, and Advanced Engineering &
Integrated Services.
Factors that could impact Defense Electronics &
Services financial results include: the level of defense funding
by domestic and foreign governments, the Companys ability
to receive contract awards and the ability to develop and market
products and services for customers outside of traditional
markets. Primary areas of business focus include: new or
improved product offerings, new contract wins, successful
program execution and capacity expansion for 2006. The Company
forecasts revenues for the Defense Electronics &
Services segment to be between $3.55 billion and
$3.58 billion with an operating income margin rate of 11.0%
to 11.1%.
Motion & Flow Control
Motion & Flow Control is comprised of a group of units
operating in the motion control and flow control market
segments. Markets served and goods and services provided for the
Motion Control businesses include: the design and manufacture of
friction pads for braking applications, the production of pumps
and related products for the leisure marine and recreational
vehicle markets, pumps and components for beverage applications
and the design and manufacturing of jets, pumps and other
components for whirlpool baths and hot tub spas. Markets served
and goods and services provided for the Flow Control businesses
include: valves, actuators and switches for the commercial,
military, regional, business and general aviation markets;
switches and regulators for the oil and gas, power generation
and chemical markets; pressure regulators and diaphragm seals
for industrial applications and natural gas vehicles.
23
The Motion & Flow Control business financial results
are driven by the cyclical nature of the transportation
industry, production levels of major auto producers, demand for
marine and leisure products, weather conditions and raw material
prices. Primary areas of business focus include: expansion into
adjacent markets, new product development, manufacturing
footprint optimization and lean fulfillment. The Company
forecasts revenues for the Motion & Flow Control
segment to be between $675 million and $695 million
with an operating income margin rate of 20.3% to 20.5%.
Electronic Components
Electronic Components provides products and services for the
areas of communications, industrial, transportation,
military/aerospace, commercial aircraft, computer, and consumer
uses. Business activities in the communications area include:
connectors, interconnects, cable assemblies, keypads, switches,
panel switch assemblies and smart card systems. In addition,
products manufactured for the industrial markets include:
industrial controls, production equipment, instrumentation,
medical applications, ultrasound, and other diagnostic
equipment. Products manufactured for the transportation market
include: high reliability connectors, multi-function control
assemblies, and switches used in power train, instrument
controls and chassis applications. Military/aerospace products
include: circular, rack and panel, micro miniature, fiber optic,
and special connectors used in military electronics,
missiles, and space applications. Commercial aircraft products
include: rack and panel, circular, and fiber optic connectors.
In the computer and consumer area, products include: connectors
and switches for computers and computer peripherals, and keypads
for remote control devices, switches for appliances and audio
circular connectors.
The Electronic Components business financial results are driven
by economic conditions in its major markets, success of new
product development, product life in the mobile phone markets
and changes in technology. Primary areas of business focus
include: global sourcing of direct material purchases,
manufacturing footprint rationalization and new product
development. The Company forecasts revenues for the Electronic
Components segment to be between $710 million and
$730 million with an operating income margin rate of 6.8%
to 7.0%.
Consolidated Financial Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Revenues |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of dollars) | |
Sales and revenues
|
|
$ |
1,886.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,765.9 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys revenues grew 6.8% in the first quarter of
2006 compared to the comparable prior year quarter. Higher
volume in all business segments and a 2005 third quarter
acquisition contributed 8.5% and 0.3% of the growth,
respectively. Foreign currency translation offset 2.0% of the
growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of Sales and Revenues |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of dollars) | |
Costs of sales and revenues
|
|
$ |
1,383.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,296.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Percentage of Sales
|
|
|
73.3 |
% |
|
|
73.4 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys costs of sales and revenues (CGS)
increased $87.1 million or 6.7% in 2006 compared to the
applicable prior year period. The increase is due to higher
volume in all segments and contributions from a 2005 third
quarter acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of dollars) | |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
$ |
270.3 |
|
|
$ |
262.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Percentage of Sales
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(SG&A) increased $7.4 million, or 2.8% in
2006 compared to the first quarter of 2005. The increase in
SG&A expenses was primarily due the recognition of employee
stock compensation during 2006 and increased marketing costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research & Development |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of dollars) | |
Internally funded
|
|
$ |
42.7 |
|
|
$ |
44.3 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
Percentage of Sales
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Development expenses (R&D)
decreased $1.6 million, or 3.6% during the first quarter of
2006 compared to the applicable 2005 period. The decrease is
attributable to the timing of project spending in most segments.
During the first quarters of 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded
$15.8 million and $18.4 million of restructuring
charges, respectively, to streamline its operating structure.
Additionally, during the first quarter of 2006,
$0.7 million of restructuring accruals were reversed into
income as management deemed that certain cash expenditures would
not be incurred. See the section entitled Restructuring
and Asset Impairment Charges and Note 8,
Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges, in the
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
Operating income for the first quarter of 2006 was
$175.1 million, an increase of $31.2 million, or
21.7%, compared to $143.9 million for 2005. The increase is
primarily due to higher volume, partially offset by increased
SG&A expenses. Segment operating margin for the first
quarter of 2006 was 10.7%, or 140 basis points, above the
comparable prior year period. The variance in segment operating
margin is primarily due to improved operating efficiencies in
all segments.
Interest expense during the first quarter of 2006 was
$19.9 million, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 1.0%
from the comparable prior year period. Additionally, the Company
recognized $3.7 million of interest income during 2006
compared to $14.2 million during the comparable 2005
period. The decrease of $10.5 million, or 73.9%, primarily
reflects the recognition of interest income during 2005
associated with tax settlements related to the closure of the
IRS tax audit for the years 1998 through 2000.
During the first quarter of 2006, income tax expense was
$46.1 million compared to $11.6 million for the
comparable prior year period. The Companys effective tax
rate also increased from 8.7% in the first quarter of 2005 to
30% in the first quarter of 2006. The variances primarily
reflect the recognition of tax settlements during 2005 totaling
approximately $30 million. Higher taxable income during
2006 compared to 2005 also contributed to the variance.
Income from continuing operations was $107.5 million, or
$0.57 per diluted share for the first quarter of 2006
compared to $121.4 million, or $0.64 per diluted share
for the comparable 2005 period. The decrease reflects the
results discussed above.
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company recognized
$48.4 million of income from discontinued operations
compared to a loss of $4.9 million in the comparable prior
year period. The 2006 income primarily relates to a
$46.5 million gain recognized on the sale of the
Companys automotive brake & fuel tubing and
components business and the Companys industrial
non-metallic lined pumps and valves business. The 2005 loss
primarily relates to losses and asset write downs associated
with the Companys Network System & Services
business and other discontinued operations expenses. Income from
the Companys automotive brake & fuel tubing and
components business partially offset the losses in 2005.
25
Segment Review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
Operating | |
|
|
Revenue | |
|
Income | |
|
Margin | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of dollars) | |
Fluid Technology
|
|
$ |
685.7 |
|
|
$ |
630.1 |
|
|
$ |
63.3 |
|
|
$ |
54.6 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Defense Electronics & Services
|
|
|
831.1 |
|
|
|
775.7 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
|
|
|
77.8 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Motion & Flow Control
|
|
|
188.3 |
|
|
|
190.0 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
Electronic Components
|
|
|
185.0 |
|
|
|
173.7 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
The Fluid Technology segment had revenues of
$685.7 million, an increase of 8.8% from the comparable
2005 period. Revenue growth of 10.9% represented contributions
from existing businesses, of which the water/wastewater and
industrial businesses were the largest contributors. Revenues
from a 2005 acquisition accounted for 0.7% of revenue growth and
foreign currency translation reduced revenue growth by (2.8%).
Operating income increased $8.7 million or 15.9% in 2006
compared to 2005. Higher volume and operational efficiencies
represent 14.9% of growth. Lower restructuring charges and
contributions from a 2005 third quarter acquisition also
provided operating income growth of 6.6%. Foreign currency
translation and the recognition of stock compensation during
2006 lowered operating income by (4.0%) and (1.6%), respectively.
|
|
|
Defense Electronics & Services |
The Defense Electronics & Services segment increased
revenues 7.1% during the first quarter of 2006 to
$831.1 million. Higher volume in the tactical
communications and systems and services businesses were the
primary drivers of growth.
In 2006, operating income increased $18.0 million or 23.1%
compared to 2005. Operating efficiencies plus higher volume in
the tactical communications and systems and services businesses
were primarily factors for 27.2% of income growth. Incremental
restructuring costs (2.6%) and stock-based compensation (1.5%)
recorded during the first quarter of 2006 partially offset
operating income growth.
Motion & Flow Control revenues decreased (0.9%) to
$188.3 million. Foreign currency translation reduced
revenues by (5.6%). Increased volume in existing businesses,
including the friction material, aerospace controls, marine and
leisure businesses accounted for 4.7% of revenue growth and
partially offset the revenue decline.
Operating income increased $4.3 million or 13.6% in 2006
compared to the first quarter of 2005. Higher volume and
operating efficiencies resulted in 14.3% of operating income
growth. Lower restructuring cost also contributed 6.6% of
operating income growth. Foreign currency translation and the
recognition of stock compensation during 2006 lowered operating
income by (6.7%) and (0.6%), respectively.
The Electronic Components segments revenue increased 6.5%
to $185.0 million in 2006 compared to the first quarter of
2005. Higher volume in both the Connectors and Switches
businesses contributed 9.8% of growth. Foreign currency
translation partially offset (3.3%) of revenue growth.
Operating income increased $6.4 million in 2006 compared to
2005. The increase reflects higher volume and improved operating
efficiencies. Foreign currency translation and the recognition
of stock compensation during 2006 partially offset the increase
in operating income.
26
Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges
|
|
|
2006 Restructuring Activities |
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company recognized a
$15.8 million restructuring charge. New actions represent
$12.8 million of the charge and costs related to previous
plans comprise $3.0 million of the charge.
The actions announced during 2006 by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The Fluid Technology segment recorded $2.3 million of
severance costs associated with the elimination of
122 positions including 86 factory workers, 30 office
workers and six management employees. Other costs totaled
$1.6 million and primarily reflect other employee benefit
costs, and employee relocation costs. The charges reflect the
continued reduction in structural costs, including the closure
of two facilities. Additional severance costs of
$1.2 million will be recognized during the remainder of
2006 related to these actions. |
|
|
|
The Electronic Components segment recorded $4.9 million of
severance costs related to the elimination of 77 positions,
including 42 factory workers, and 35 office workers. These
charges reflect the structural realignment of the segment. |
|
|
|
The Defense Electronics & Services segment recorded
$2.0 million of severance costs for the elimination of
60 positions, including three factory workers, 44 office
workers and 13 management employees. These charges reflect the
reduction of structural costs. |
|
|
|
The Motion & Flow Control segment recorded
$0.7 million of severance costs reflecting the elimination
of 125 positions, including 107 factory workers, 16 office
workers and two management employees. Asset write-offs
associated with the charges were $1.2 million. The charges
reflect the closure of one facility and the reduction of
structural costs. Additional severance costs of
$0.8 million will be recognized during the remainder of
2006 related to these actions. |
|
|
|
Corporate headquarters recorded a charge of $0.1 million
for the elimination of the position of one office worker. |
The Company also recognized $1.5 million of severance cost
in the Electronic Components segment related to actions
announced prior to 2006. Additionally, the segment incurred
$0.6 million of other costs associated with previously
announced actions.
The Motion & Flow Control segment recorded
$0.2 million of other costs and $0.2 million of
amortized severance costs associated with previously announced
actions.
The Fluid Technology segment recorded $0.4 million of other
costs and $0.1 million of severance costs associated with
previously announced plans.
During the first quarter of 2006 the Company made
$2.1 million of payments attributable to restructuring
actions announced during 2006.
The projected future savings from restructuring actions
announced during 2006 are approximately $12.9 million,
during 2006 and $99.9 million, between 2007 and 2011. The
savings primarily represent lower salary and wage expenditures
and will be reflected in Costs of Sales and Revenues
and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.
|
|
|
2005 Restructuring Activities |
During 2005, the Company recognized a $71.1 million
restructuring charge. New actions represent $69.8 million
of the charge. Costs associated with actions announced during
previous year plans represent $1.3 million of the charge.
The actions by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The Fluid Technology segment recorded $28.8 million of
severance costs for the elimination of 466 positions,
including 236 factory workers, 207 office workers and 23
management employees. Lease cancellation and other costs were
$0.9 million and $0.8 million respectively.
Additionally, assets write-offs totaling $1.4 million were
also recorded. The charges reflect a reduction in structural
costs, including the closure of four facilities. |
27
|
|
|
|
|
The Electronic Components segment recorded $25.8 million
for the elimination of 1,246 positions, including 926 factory
workers, 286 office workers and 34 management employees. Other
costs totaling $1.9 million, primarily representing
contract termination costs, lease costs, and other were also
recognized during the year. Asset write-offs associated with the
restructuring actions totaled $0.1 million. These actions
reflect the continued reorganization of the segment, including
the closure of three facilities. |
|
|
|
The Motion & Flow Control segment recognized
$8.9 million for the elimination of 274 positions,
including 163 factory workers, 97 office workers and 14
management employees. Other costs totaling $0.6 million and
lease costs of $0.2 million were also recognized during the
year. The headcount reductions relate to workforce reductions,
the consolidation of functions, the transfer of functions from
France to Holland, and the outsourcing of selected functions to
Eastern Europe. |
|
|
|
Corporate headquarters recorded $0.4 million for the
elimination of one management position. |
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company made
$15.1 million of payments attributable to 2005
restructuring actions. Future restructuring expenditures will be
funded with cash from operations, supplemented on an interim
basis, if required, with commercial paper borrowings.
The projected future cash savings from the restructuring actions
announced during 2005 are approximately $64 million during
2006 and $266 million between 2007 and 2010. The savings
primarily represent lower salary and wage expenditures and will
be reflected in Costs of Sales and Revenues and
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.
|
|
|
2005 Asset Impairment Charges |
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company conducted a
strategic review of the Electronic Components segment because
certain businesses within the segment were experiencing lower
than expected financial results. As a result, the Company
recorded an impairment charge amounting to $8.3 million to
write down certain long-lived assets to fair value. The
applicable assets were written down to their fair values based
upon managements comparison of projected future discounted
cash flows generated by each asset to the applicable
assets carrying value. This impairment was unrelated to
the Companys restructuring activities.
The long-lived asset impairment coupled with updated financial
forecasts generated in the fourth quarter represented an
indicator that goodwill may also be impaired. Accordingly, the
Company assessed goodwill allocated to the Switches component of
the Electronic Components segment and recorded an impairment
charge of $214.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2005.
(Total asset impairment charges recorded in the Electronics
Components segment in the fourth quarter of 2005 were
$222.7 million.) The estimated fair value of Switches was
computed principally based upon the present value of future cash
flows (Discounted Cash Flow Method), historical results and
comparative market data. This impairment was also unrelated to
the Companys restructuring activities.
As a result of the strategic review, described above, the
Company has decided to dispose of the Switches component of the
Electronic Components segment. The Company is in the process of
preparing this business for sale. The Switches business within
the Electronic Components segment is reported in continuing
operations for the first quarter of 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
Sources and Uses of Cash: |
The Company used $43.0 million of cash during the first
quarter of 2006. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company
generated $7.3 million in cash from operating activities.
The difference in cash used/generated from operating activities
is primarily due to approximately $51 million of additional
tax payments.
In both the first quarter of 2006 and 2005, a $100 million
voluntary pre-funding of pension obligations was made.
28
|
|
|
Additions to Plant, Property and Equipment: |
Capital expenditures during the first quarter of 2006 were
$29.7 million, an increase of $3.3 million from the
first quarter of 2005. The increase primarily reflects increased
investments by the Defense Electronic & Services and
Fluid Technology segments.
2006 Acquisitions
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company spent
$23.7 million for the acquisition of a company which is
included in the Defense and Electronic Services segment.
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company completed the sale of
its automotive brake & fuel tubing and components
business to a privately held company, for net proceeds of
$198.9 million. The business, which was a component of the
Companys Motion & Flow Control segment,
manufactures steel and plastic tubing for fuel and brake lines,
quick-connects, and serves the transportation industry.
Additionally, during the first quarter of 2006, the Company
completed the sale of its industrial non-metallic lined pumps
and valves business to a private equity investor, for net
proceeds of $21.9 million. The business, which was a
component of the Companys Fluid Technology segment, is a
leading manufacturer of pumps and valves for selected segments
in the chemical, fine chemical, and pharmaceutical industries.
The Company recognized gains on these two transactions totaling
approximately $46.5 million.
|
|
|
Sale of Plant, Property and Equipment: |
During the first three months of 2006, the Company generated
$4.5 million of cash primarily from the sale of a building
in the Fluid Technology Segment. In the first quarter of 2005,
the Company generated $3.6 million of cash from the sale of
one property.
Financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March, 31 | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Cash & Cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
623.8 |
|
|
$ |
451.0 |
|
Total Debt
|
|
|
1,333.9 |
|
|
|
1,267.7 |
|
Net Debt
|
|
|
710.1 |
|
|
|
816.7 |
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
2,861.2 |
|
|
|
2,723.4 |
|
Total Capitalization (debt plus equity)
|
|
|
4,195.1 |
|
|
|
3,991.1 |
|
Net Capitalization (debt plus equity less cash)
|
|
|
3,571.3 |
|
|
|
3,540.1 |
|
Debt to total capitalization
|
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
Net debt to net capitalization
|
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
|
Share Repurchases and Other Matters: |
In the first quarter of 2006 and 2005, the Company repurchased
1.4 million and 1.9 million shares for
$68.8 million and $82.4 million, respectively, to
offset the dilutive effect of exercised stock options.
On February 21, 2006, the Company effected a two-for-one
stock split of its common stock. The financial statements, notes
and other references to share and per share data have been
restated to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.
29
|
|
|
Debt and Credit Facilities: |
Debt at March 31, 2006 was $1,333.9 million, compared
with $1,267.7 million at December 31, 2005. The change
in debt levels primarily reflect the funding of the repurchase
of common stock (net of proceeds from the issuance of common
stock), dividend payments, and capital expenditures. Cash and
cash equivalents were $623.8 million at March 31,
2006, compared to $451.0 million at December 31, 2005.
The change in cash levels primarily reflects proceeds received
from the sale of businesses.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported value of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities.
The Company has identified three accounting policies where
estimates are used that require assumptions or factors that are
of an uncertain nature, or where a different estimate could have
been reasonably utilized or changes in the estimate are
reasonably likely to occur from period to period.
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded on a site by
site basis when it is probable that a liability has been
incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company
calculates the liability by utilizing a cost estimating and
weighting matrix that separates costs into recurring and
non-recurring categories. The Company then uses internal and
external experts to assign confidence levels based on the
sites development stage, type of contaminant found,
applicable laws, existing technologies and the identification of
other potentially responsible parties. This methodology produces
a range of estimates, including a best estimate. At
March 31, 2006, the Companys best estimate is
$93.0 million, which approximates the accrual related to
the remediation of ground water and soil. The low range estimate
for environmental liabilities is $67.4 million and the high
range estimate is $149.2 million. On an annual basis the
Company spends between $8.0 million and $11.0 million
on its environmental remediation liabilities. These estimates,
and related accruals, are reviewed periodically and updated for
progress of remediation efforts and changes in facts and legal
circumstances. Liabilities for environmental expenditures are
recorded on an undiscounted basis.
The Company is currently involved in the environmental
investigation and remediation of approximately 56 ongoing sites,
including certain instances where it is considered to be a
potentially responsible party by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) or similar state agency.
At present, the Company is involved in litigation against its
insurers for reimbursement of environmental response costs.
Recoveries from insurance companies or other third parties are
recognized in the financial statements when it is probable that
they will be realized.
In the event that future remediation expenditures are in excess
of the amounts accrued, management does not anticipate that they
will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated
financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the
Company.
For additional details on environmental matters see
Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies, in the
Notes to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
The Company sponsors numerous employee pension and welfare
benefit plans. The determination of projected benefit
obligations and the recognition of expenses related to pension
and other postretirement obligations are dependent on
assumptions used in calculating these amounts. These assumptions
include: discount rates, expected rates of return on plan
assets, rate of future compensation increases, mortality,
termination, health care inflation trend rates (some of which
are disclosed in Note 19, Employee Benefit
Plans, within the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of the 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K) and
other factors.
30
The Company determines its expected return on plan assets
assumption by evaluating both historical returns and estimates
of future returns. Specifically, the Company analyzes the
Plans actual historical annual return on assets over the
past 10, 15, 20 and 25 years; makes estimates of
future returns using a Capital Asset Pricing Model; and
evaluates historical broad market returns over the past
75 years based on the Companys strategic asset
allocation, which is detailed in Note 19, Employee
Benefit Plans, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of the 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Based on the approach described above, the Company estimates the
long-term annual rate of return on assets for domestic pension
plans at 9.0%. For reference, the Companys actual
geometric average annual return on plan assets for domestic
pension plans stood at 11.4%, 12.3%, 12.0% and 12.0%, for the
past 10, 15, 20, and 25 year periods,
respectively. The Companys weighted average expected
return on plan assets for all pension plans, including foreign
affiliate plans, at December 31, 2005, is 8.89%.
The Company utilizes the assistance of its plan actuaries in
determining the discount rate assumption. As a service to its
clients, the plan actuaries have developed and published an
interest rate yield curve comprised of AAA/ AA bonds with
maturities between zero and thirty years. The plan actuaries
then discount the annual benefit cash flows of the
Companys pension plan using this yield curve and develop a
single-point discount rate matching the plans
characteristics.
As a result of this process, at December 31, 2005, the
Company lowered the discount rate on its domestic pension plans,
which represent about 90% of the Companys total pension
obligations, from 6.00% to 5.75%. The Companys weighted
average discount rate for all pension plans, including foreign
affiliate plans, at December 31, 2005, is 5.64%. Also, at
December 31, 2005, the Company lowered the discount rate on
its postretirement welfare plans from 5.75% to 5.50%.
At December 31, 2005, the Company maintained its expected
rate of future compensation increases for its domestic plan
participants at 4.5%, based on recent historical experience and
expectations for future economic conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Long-Term Rate of Return on Assets used to determine net
periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
8.89 |
% |
|
|
8.86 |
% |
Discount Rate used to determine net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
5.94 |
% |
|
|
6.18 |
% |
Discount Rate used to determine benefit obligation at
December 31
|
|
|
5.64 |
% |
|
|
5.94 |
% |
Rate of future compensation increase used to determine benefit
obligation at December 31
|
|
|
4.44 |
% |
|
|
4.41 |
% |
Management develops each assumption using relevant Company
experience in conjunction with market related data for each
individual country in which such plans exist. All assumptions
are reviewed periodically with third party actuarial consultants
and adjusted as necessary.
|
|
|
Pension Plan Accounting and Information: |
With respect to its qualified U.S. defined benefit pension
plans and one of its retiree medical plans, the Company has set
up a U.S. Master Trust to pay future benefits to eligible
retirees and dependents.
The Companys strategic asset allocation target for its
U.S. domestic plans apportions 70% of all assets to equity
instruments and the remaining 30% to fixed income instruments.
At December 31, 2005, the Companys actual asset
allocation was 69.8% in equity instruments, 14.3% in fixed
income instruments and 15.8% in hedge funds, with the remainder
in cash and other.
On an annual basis, the Companys long-term expected return
on plan assets will often differ from the actual return on plan
assets. The chart below shows actual returns versus the expected
long-term returns for the Companys domestic pension plans
that are utilized in the calculation of the net periodic benefit
cost.
31
Please see Note 19, Employee Benefit Plans, in
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the 2005
Annual Report on Form 10-K, for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expected Return on Assets
|
|
|
9.00 |
% |
|
|
9.00 |
% |
|
|
9.00 |
% |
|
|
9.75 |
% |
|
|
9.75 |
% |
Actual Return on Assets
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
(11.4 |
)% |
|
|
(4.0 |
)% |
The Companys Defense Electronics & Services
segment represents approximately 60% of the active
U.S. Salaried Plan participants. As a result, the Company
has sought and will continue to seek reimbursement from the
Department of Defense for a portion of its pension costs, in
accordance with government regulations. U.S. Government
Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) govern the extent to which
pension costs are allocable to and recoverable under contracts
with the U.S. Government. Reimbursements of pension costs
are made over time through the pricing of the Companys
products and services on U.S. Government contracts, and
therefore, are recognized in the Defense Electronics &
Services segments net sales.
Funding requirements under IRS rules are a major consideration
in making contributions to our pension plan. With respect to its
qualified pension plans, the Company intends to contribute
annually not less than the minimum required by applicable law
and regulations. The Company contributed $100.0 million in
2005, and an additional $100.0 million in the first quarter
of 2006 to the U.S. Master Trust for the U.S. Salaried
Pension Plan. Furthermore, we currently estimate that we will
not make significant additional contributions to the
Companys U.S. Salaried Pension Plan during the
remainder of 2006.
Assuming that current IRS contribution rules continue to apply
in the future, and barring major disruptions in the equity and
bond markets, the Company estimates that it will not be required
to make mandatory contributions in the 2006 to 2007 timeframe.
Funded status is derived by subtracting the value of the
projected benefit obligations at December 31, 2005 from the
end of year fair value of plan assets. The Companys
U.S. Salaried Pension Plan represents approximately 80% of
the Companys total pension obligation, and therefore the
funded status of the U.S. Salaried Pension Plan has a
considerable impact on the overall funded status of the
Companys pension plans.
As more fully described in Note 19, Employee Benefit
Plans, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
the funded status for the Companys U.S. Salaried Plan
improved by $121.4 million to $(221.5) million at the
end of 2005. Funded status for the Companys total pension
obligations, including foreign and affiliate plans, improved by
$117.5 million to $(623.3) million at the end of 2005.
Funded status at the end of 2006 will depend primarily on the
actual return on assets during the year and the discount rate at
the end of the year. The Company estimates that every
25 basis point change in the discount rate impacts the
funded status of the U.S. Salaried Pension Plan, which
represents about 80% of the Companys pension obligations,
by approximately $132 million. Similarly, every five
percentage point change in the actual 2006 rate of return on
assets impacts the same plan by approximately $197 million.
|
|
|
Minimum Pension Liability: |
SFAS No. 87 Employers Accounting for
Pensions, (SFAS No. 87), requires
that a minimum pension liability be recorded if a plans
market value of assets falls below the plans accumulated
benefit obligation.
At December 31, 2005, the Companys minimum pension
liability recorded in shareholders equity is
$(120.4) million. In 2005, the Company recorded an
after-tax increase to its shareholders equity of
$400.0 million due to the plans improved funded
status.
Future recognition or reversal of additional minimum pension
liabilities will depend primarily on the rate of return on
assets and the prevailing discount rate.
32
The Company recorded $82.5 million of net periodic pension
cost ($83.0 million after considering the effects of
curtailment losses and settlements) into its Consolidated Income
Statement in 2005, compared with net periodic pension cost of
$59.9 million ($63.2 million including curtailments)
in 2004. As more fully described in Note 19, Employee
Benefit Plans, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of the 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K, the
primary drivers behind the increase in the net periodic pension
cost were the effect of the change in the discount rate and the
increased amortization of past losses in 2005.
In 2006, the Company expects to incur approximately
$95.4 million of net periodic pension cost that will be
recorded into its Consolidated Income Statement. The increase in
net periodic pension cost is primarily due to the effect of the
change in discount rate, and the higher amortization of past
losses.
The Company recognizes revenue as services are rendered and when
title transfers for products, subject to any special terms and
conditions of specific contracts. For the majority of the
Companys sales, title transfers when products are shipped.
Under certain circumstances, title passes when products are
delivered. In the Defense Electronics & Services
segment, certain contracts require the delivery, installation,
testing, certification and customer acceptance before revenue
can be recorded. Further, some sales are recognized when the
customer picks up the product.
The Defense Electronics & Services segment typically
recognizes revenue and anticipated profits under long-term,
fixed-price contracts based on units of delivery or the
completion of scheduled performance milestones. Estimated
contract costs and resulting margins are recorded in proportion
to recorded sales. During the performance of such contracts,
estimated final contract prices and costs (design,
manufacturing, and engineering and development costs) are
periodically reviewed and revisions are made when necessary. The
effect of these revisions to estimates is included in earnings
in the period in which revisions are made. There were no
material revisions to estimates in the covered periods.
Accruals for estimated expenses related to warranties are made
at the time products are sold or services are rendered. These
accruals are established using historical information on the
nature, frequency and average cost of warranty claims and
estimates of future costs. Management believes the warranty
accruals are adequate; however, actual warranty expenses could
differ from estimated amounts. The accrual for product
warranties at March 31, 2006 and 2005 was
$49.5 million and $38.7 million, respectively. See
Note 14, Guarantees, Indemnities and
Warranties, in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed
Financial Statements for additional details.
Accounting Pronouncements
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R) issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) which is
a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. This statement eliminates the
option of using the intrinsic value method of accounting for
employee stock options (historically utilized by the Company),
which generally resulted in the recognition of no compensation
cost because the exercise price of the Companys stock
options granted to employees and directors equaled the fair
market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. The
provisions of the SFAS No. 123R require the
recognition of employee services received in exchange for awards
of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the
awards as determined by option pricing models. The calculated
compensation cost is recognized over the period that the
employee is required to provide services per the conditions of
the award.
The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified
prospective method, which requires the application of the
accounting standard as of January 1, 2006, the first day of
the Companys fiscal year 2006. The Companys
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements as of and for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 reflect the impact of
SFAS 123R. In accordance with the modified prospective
transition method, the Companys Consolidated Condensed
Financial Statements for prior periods have not been
33
restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of
SFAS 123R. Stock-based compensation expense recognized
under SFAS 123R for the three months ended March 31,
2006 was $7.6 million which consisted of stock-based
compensation expense related to employee stock options and
restricted shares of common stock. There was no stock-based
compensation expense related to employee stock options during
the three months ended March 31, 2005. See Note 7
Stock-Based and Long-Term Incentive Employee
Compensation in the Notes to Consolidated Condensed
Financial Statements for additional details.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
(SFAS No. 154), which replaces Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 20
Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial
Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the
requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in
accounting principle, and applies to all voluntary changes in
accounting principles, as well as changes required by an
accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that it does
not include specific transition provisions. Specifically,
SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to
prior periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable
to determine the period specific effects or the cumulative
effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 does not change the
transition provisions of any existing pronouncement.
SFAS No. 154 is effective for the Company for all
accounting changes and corrections of errors made beginning
January 1, 2006.
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 155, Accounting for Certain
Hybrid Financial Instruments an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 133 and 140 which is effective for
fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The
statement was issued to clarify the application of FASB
Statement No. 133 to beneficial interests in securitized
financial assets and to improve the consistency of accounting
for similar financial instruments, regardless of the form of the
instruments. We are currently evaluating the new statement to
determine the potential impact, if any, this would have on our
financial results.
Risks and Uncertainties
The Company is subject to stringent environmental laws and
regulations that affect its operating facilities and impose
liability for the cleanup of past discharges of hazardous
substances. In the United States, these laws include the Federal
Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act. Management believes that the
Company is in substantial compliance with these and all other
applicable environmental requirements. Environmental compliance
costs are accounted for as normal operating expenses.
In estimating the costs of environmental investigation and
remediation, the Company considers, among other things,
regulatory standards, its prior experience in remediating
contaminated sites, and the professional judgment of
environmental experts. It is difficult to estimate the total
costs of investigation and remediation due to various factors,
including incomplete information regarding particular sites and
other potentially responsible parties, uncertainty regarding the
extent of contamination and the Companys share, if any, of
liability for such problems, the selection of alternative
remedies, and changes in cleanup standards. When it is possible
to create reasonable estimates of liability with respect to
environmental matters, the Company establishes accruals in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted within
the United States. Insurance recoveries are included in other
assets when it is probable that a claim will be realized.
Although the outcome of the Companys various remediation
efforts presently cannot be predicted with a high level of
certainty, management does not expect that these matters will
have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows. For disclosure of the Companys commitments and
contingencies, see Note 21, Commitments and
Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements of the 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
34
Forward-Looking Statements
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act):
Certain material presented herein includes forward-looking
statements intended to qualify for the safe harbor from
liability established by the Act. These forward-looking
statements include statements that describe the Companys
business strategy, outlook, objectives, plans, intentions or
goals, and any discussion of future operating or financial
performance. Whenever used words such as anticipate,
estimate, expect, project,
intend, plan, believe,
target and other terms of similar meaning are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are uncertain and to some extent
unpredictable, and involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or
implied from, such forward-looking statements. Factors that
could cause results to differ materially from those anticipated
by the Company include general global economic conditions,
decline in consumer spending, interest and foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations, availability of commodities,
supplies and raw materials, competition, acquisitions or
divestitures, changes in government defense budgets, employment
and pension matters, contingencies related to actual or alleged
environmental contamination, claims and concerns, intellectual
property matters, personal injury claims, governmental
investigations, tax obligations, and changes in generally
accepted accounting principles. Other factors are more
thoroughly set forth in Item 1. Business, Item 1 A. Risk
Factors and Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Forward-Looking Statements in the ITT
Industries, Inc. Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and other of its
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company
undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There has been no material change in the information concerning
market risk as stated in the Companys 2005 Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company have evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded
that, as of the end of the period covered by this report the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective
in identifying, on a timely basis, material information required
to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the
Exchange Act.
(b) There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that have
materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially
affect the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The following should be read in conjunction with Note 13 to
the unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial
statements in Part I of this report, as well as
Part I, Item 3 of the Companys 2005 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
The Company and its subsidiaries from time to time are involved
in legal proceedings that are incidental to the operation of
their businesses. Some of these proceedings allege damages
against the Company relating to environmental liabilities,
intellectual property matters, copyright infringement, personal
injury claims, employment and pension matters, government
contract issues and commercial or contractual disputes,
sometimes related to acquisitions or divestitures. The Company
will continue to vigorously defend itself
35
against all claims. Although the ultimate outcome of any legal
matter cannot be predicted with certainty, based on present
information including the Companys assessment of the
merits of the particular claim, as well as its current reserves
and insurance coverage, the Company does not expect that such
legal proceedings will have any material adverse impact on the
cash flow, results of operations, or financial condition of the
Company on a consolidated basis in the foreseeable future.
Item 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Average Price Paid | |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased(1) | |
|
Per Share(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
1/1/06 1/31/06
|
|
|
200,046 |
|
|
$ |
52.63 |
|
2/1/06 2/28/06
|
|
|
168,600 |
|
|
$ |
52.79 |
|
3/1/06 3/31/06
|
|
|
1,177,749 |
|
|
$ |
55.30 |
|
|
|
(1) |
All share repurchases were made in open-market transactions.
None of these transactions were made pursuant to a publicly
announced repurchase plan. |
|
(2) |
Average price paid per share is calculated on a settlement basis
and excludes commission. |
The Companys strategy for cash flow utilization is to pay
dividends first and then repurchase Company common stock to
cover option exercises made pursuant to the Companys stock
option programs. The remaining cash is then available for
strategic acquisitions and discretionary repurchases of the
Companys common stock and repayment of debt.
Item 6.
EXHIBITS
(a) See the Exhibit Index for a list of exhibits filed
herewith.
36
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
ITT Industries, Inc. |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Robert J. Pagano, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Pagano, Jr. |
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller |
|
(Principal accounting officer) |
May 10, 2006
37
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
|
Location |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
(a) ITT Industries, Inc.s Restated Articles of
Incorporation |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 (a) of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005. (CIK No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
|
|
|
(b) ITT Industries, Inc.s By-laws, as amended
December 7, 2004 |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to ITT
Industries Form 8-K Current Report dated
December 9, 2004. (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(4) |
|
|
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including
indentures |
|
Not required to be filed. The Registrant hereby agrees to file
with the Commission a copy of any instrument defining the rights
of holders of long-term debt of the Registrant and its
consolidated subsidiaries upon request of the Commission. |
|
|
(10) |
|
|
Material contracts |
|
|
|
|
(10.1) |
* |
|
Employment Agreement dated as of February 5, 2004 between
ITT Industries, Inc. and Edward W. Williams |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ITT
Industries Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.2) |
* |
|
Employment Agreement dated as of June 28, 2004 between ITT
Industries, Inc. and Steven R. Loranger |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.3) |
* |
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Band A
Employees |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of ITT
Industries Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.4) |
* |
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Band B
Employees |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of ITT
Industries Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.5) |
* |
|
ITT Industries, Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (amended and
restated as of July 13, 2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
|
Location |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(10.6) |
* |
|
ITT Industries, Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (amended and
restated as of July 13, 2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.7) |
* |
|
ITT Industries, Inc. 1997 Annual Incentive Plan for Executive
Officers (amended and restated as of July 13, 2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.8) |
|
|
1994 ITT Industries Incentive Stock Plan (amended and restated
as of July 13, 2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.9) |
* |
|
ITT Industries Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan
(amended and restated as of July 13, 2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.10) |
* |
|
ITT Industries 1996 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (amended and restated as of July 13, 2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.11) |
* |
|
ITT Industries Enhanced Severance Pay Plan (amended and restated
as of July 13, 2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.12) |
* |
|
ITT Industries Deferred Compensation Plan (Effective as of
January 1, 1995 including amendments through July 13,
2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.13) |
* |
|
ITT Industries 1997 Annual Incentive Plan (amended and restated
as of July 13, 2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
|
Location |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(10.14) |
* |
|
ITT Industries Excess Pension Plan IA |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.15) |
* |
|
ITT Industries Excess Pension Plan IB |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.16) |
* |
|
ITT Industries Excess Pension Plan II (as amended and
restated as of July 13, 2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.17) |
* |
|
ITT Industries Excess Savings Plan (as amended and restated as
of July 13, 2004) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.18) |
* |
|
ITT Industries Excess Benefit Trust |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.19) |
|
|
Form of indemnification agreement with directors |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to ITT
Industries Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.20) |
|
|
Distribution Agreement among ITT Corporation, ITT Destinations,
Inc. and ITT Hartford Group, Inc. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 listed under ITT
Industries Form 8-B dated December 20, 1995 (CIK
No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.21) |
|
|
Intellectual Property License Agreement between and among ITT
Corporation, ITT Destinations, Inc. and ITT Hartford Group,
Inc. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ITT
Industries Form 8-B dated December 20, 1995 (CIK
No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.22) |
|
|
Tax Allocation Agreement among ITT Corporation, ITT
Destinations, Inc. and ITT Hartford Group, Inc. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to ITT
Industries Form 8-B dated December 20, 1995 (CIK
No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
|
Location |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(10.23) |
|
|
Employee Benefit Services and Liability Agreement among ITT
Corporation, ITT Destinations, Inc. and ITT Hartford Group,
Inc. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to ITT
Industries Form 8-B dated December 20, 1995 (CIK
No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.24) |
|
|
Five-year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility
Agreement dated as of November 10, 2005 |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ITT
Industries Form 8-K Current Report dated
November 10, 2005 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.25) |
|
|
Agreement with Valeo SA with respect to the sale of the
Automotive Electrical Systems Business |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to ITT
Industries Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 1998 (CIK
No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.26) |
|
|
Agreement with Continental AG with respect to the sale of the
Automotive Brakes and Chassis Business |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to ITT
Industries Form 8-K Current Report dated
October 13, 1998 (CIK No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.27) |
|
|
Participation Agreement among ITT Industries, Rexus L.L.C.
(Rexus) and Air Bail S.A.S. and RBS Lombard, Inc., as investors,
and master lease agreement, lease supplements and related
agreements between Rexus as lessor and ITT Industries, as lessee |
|
Incorporated by Reference to Exhibits listed under
Item 9.01 to ITT Industries Form 8-K Current Report
dated December 20, 2004 (CIK No. 216228, File
No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.28) |
* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award for Non-Employee Directors |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (CIK No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.29) |
* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award for Employees |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (CIK No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.30) |
|
|
Amended and Restated 364-day Revolving Credit Agreement |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to ITT
Industries Form 8-K dated March 28, 2005 (CIK
No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
|
Location |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(10.31) |
* |
|
Employment Agreement dated as of May 31, 2005 and effective
as of July 1, 2005 between ITT Industries, Inc. and George
E. Minnich |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of ITT
Industries Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005. (CIK No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.32) |
* |
|
Separation Agreement dated September 7, 2005 and effective
as of September 30, 2005 between ITT Industries, Inc. and
Robert Ayers |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to ITT
Industries Form 8-K dated September 8, 2005 (CIK
No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.33) |
|
|
Non-Employee Director Compensation Agreement |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ITT
Industries Form 8-K Current Report dated
December 1, 2005 (CIK No. 216228, File No. 1-5672). |
|
|
(10.34) |
* |
|
Form of 2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Band
A Employees |
|
Attached hereto. |
|
|
(10.35) |
* |
|
Form of 2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement for Band
B Employees |
|
Attached hereto. |
|
|
(10.36) |
* |
|
Form of 2006 Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Employees |
|
Attached hereto. |
|
|
(10.37) |
|
|
Form of 2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement for
Non-Employee Directors |
|
Attached hereto. |
|
|
(11) |
|
|
Statement re computation of per share earnings |
|
Not required to be filed. |
|
|
(12) |
|
|
Statement re computation of ratios |
|
Not required to be filed. |
|
|
(18) |
|
|
Letter re change in accounting principles |
|
None. |
|
|
(21) |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
Not required to be filed. |
|
|
(22) |
|
|
Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security
holders |
|
Not required to be filed. |
|
|
(24) |
|
|
Power of attorney |
|
None. |
|
|
(31.1) |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
(31.2) |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
Filed herewith. |
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
|
Location |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(32.1) |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
This Exhibit is intended to be furnished in accordance
with Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(32)(ii) and shall
not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly
set forth by specific reference. |
|
|
(32.2) |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
This Exhibit is intended to be furnished in accordance
with Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(32)(ii) and shall
not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly
set forth by specific reference. |
|
|
* |
Management compensatory plan |
43
Exhibit 10.34
FORM OF 2006 BAND A EMPLOYEE OPTION AGREEMENT
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC.
2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), effective as of the _______ of ___________, by
and between ITT Industries, Inc. (the "Company") and [name] (the "Optionee"),
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Optionee is now employed by the Company or an Affiliate (as defined
in the Company's 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of July
13, 2004 (the "Plan")) as an employee, and in recognition of the Optionee's
valued services, the Company, through the Compensation and Personnel Committee
of its Board of Directors (the "Committee"), desires to provide an opportunity
for the Optionee to acquire or enlarge stock ownership in the Company, pursuant
to the provisions of the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement and the provisions of the Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as part of this Agreement, and any administrative rules and
regulations related to the Plan as may be adopted by the Committee, the parties
hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Grant of Options. In accordance with, and subject to, the terms and
conditions of the Plan and this Agreement, the Company hereby confirms the
grant on _____________ (the "Grant Date") to the Optionee of the option to
purchase from the Company all or any part of an aggregate of _____ shares
of common stock of the Company (the "Option"), at the purchase price of
$_____ per share (the "Option Price" or "Exercise Price"). The Option shall
be a Nonqualified Stock Option.
2. Terms and Conditions. It is understood and agreed that the Option is
subject to the following terms and conditions:
(a) Expiration Date. The Option shall expire on (seven years from the
grant date), or, if the Optionee's employment terminates before that
date, on the date specified in subsection (e) below.
(b) Exercise of Option. The Option may not be exercised until it has
become vested.
(c) Vesting. Subject to subsections 2(a) and 2(e), the Option shall vest
in full upon the first to occur of the following events:
(i) (three years from the grant date); or
(ii) an Acceleration Event (as defined in the Plan).
(d) Payment of Exercise Price and Tax Withholding. Permissible methods for
payment of the Exercise Price and for satisfaction of tax withholding
obligations
upon exercise of the Option shall be as described in Section 6.6 and
Article 14 of the Plan, or, if the Plan is amended, successor
provisions. In addition to the methods of exercise permitted by
Section 6.6 of the Plan, the Optionee may exercise the Option by way
of a broker-assisted cashless exercise in a manner consistent with the
Federal Reserve Board's Regulation T, unless the Committee determines
that such exercise method is prohibited by law.
(e) Effect of Termination of Employment.
If the Optionee's employment terminates before (seven years from the
grant date), the Option shall expire on the date set forth below, as
applicable:
(i) Termination due to Death. If the Optionee's employment is
terminated as a result of the Optionee's death, the Option shall
immediately expire on the earlier of (seven years from the grant
date) or the date three years after the termination of the
Optionee's employment due to death. If the Option is not vested
at the time of the Optionee's termination of employment, the
Option shall immediately become 100% vested.
(ii) Termination due to Disability. If the Optionee's employment is
terminated as a result of the Optionee's Disability (as defined
below), the Option shall expire on the earlier of (seven years
from the grant date) or the date five years after the termination
of the Optionee's employment due to Disability. If the Option is
not vested at the time of the Optionee's termination of
employment, the Option shall immediately become 100% vested.
(iii) Termination due to Retirement. If the Optionee's employment is
terminated as a result of the Optionee's Retirement (as defined
below), the Option shall expire on the earlier of (seven years
from the grant date) or the date five years after the termination
of the Optionee's employment due to Retirement. If the Option is
not vested at the time of the Optionee's termination of
employment, a prorated portion of the Option shall immediately
vest as of the date of the termination of employment (see
"Prorated Vesting Upon Retirement" below). Any remaining unvested
portion of the Option shall expire as of the date of the
termination of the Optionee's employment. For purposes of this
subsection 2(e)(iii), the Optionee shall be considered employed
during any period in which the Optionee is receiving severance in
the form of salary continuation, and the date of the termination
of the Optionee's employment shall be the last day of any such
severance period.
(iv) Voluntary Termination; Cause. If the Optionee's employment is
terminated by the Optionee for any reason other than Retirement,
Disability, or death, or by the Company (or an Affiliate, as the
case may be) for cause (as determined by the Committee), the
vested and unvested portions of the Option shall expire on the
date of the termination of the Optionee's employment.
(v) Other Termination by the Company. If the Option is vested and the
Optionee's employment is terminated by the Company (or an
Affiliate, as the case may be) for other than cause (as
determined by the Committee),
and not because of the Optionee's Retirement, Disability, or
death, the Option shall expire on the earlier of (seven years
from the grant date) or the date three months after the
termination of the Optionee's employment. If the Option is not
vested on the date the Optionee's employment terminates, the
Option shall expire immediately in full on the date of
termination of employment, and the Option shall not thereafter be
exercisable. For purposes of this subsection 2(e)(v), the
Optionee shall be considered employed during any period in which
the Optionee is receiving severance in the form of salary
continuation, and the date of the termination of the Optionee's
employment shall be the last day of any such severance period.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Optionee's employment is
terminated on or after an Acceleration Event (A) by the Company (or an
Affiliate, as the case may be) for other than cause (as determined by
the Committee), and not because of the Optionee's Retirement,
Disability, or death, or (B) by the Optionee because the Optionee in
good faith believed that as a result of such Acceleration Event he or
she was unable effectively to discharge his or her present duties or
the duties of the position the Optionee occupied just prior to the
occurrence of such Acceleration Event, the Option shall in no event
expire before the earlier of the date that is 7 months after the
Acceleration Event or (seven years from the grant date).
Retirement. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Retirement"
shall mean the termination of the Optionee's employment if, at the
time of such termination, the Optionee is eligible to commence receipt
of retirement benefits under a traditional formula defined benefit
pension plan maintained by the Company or an Affiliate (or would be
eligible to receive such benefits if he or she were a participant in
such a traditional formula defined benefit pension plan).
Disability. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Disability"
shall mean the complete and permanent inability of the Optionee to
perform all of his or her duties under the terms of his or her
employment, as determined by the Committee upon the basis of such
evidence, including independent medical reports and data, as the
Committee deems appropriate or necessary.
Prorated Vesting Upon Retirement. The prorated portion of an Option
that vests upon termination of the Optionee's employment due to the
Optionee's Retirement shall be determined by multiplying the total
number of unvested shares subject to the Option at the time of the
termination of the Optionee's employment by a fraction, the numerator
of which is the number of full months the Optionee has been
continually employed since the Grant Date and the denominator of which
is 36. For this purpose, full months of employment shall be based on
monthly anniversaries of the Grant Date, not calendar months.
(f) Compliance with Laws and Regulations. The Option shall not be
exercised at any time when its exercise or the delivery of shares
hereunder would be in violation of any law, rule, or regulation that
the Company may find to be valid and applicable.
(g) Optionee Bound by Plan and Rules. The Optionee hereby acknowledges
receipt of a copy of the Plan and this Agreement and agrees to be
bound by the
terms and provisions thereof. The Optionee agrees to be bound by any
rules and regulations for administering the Plan as may be adopted by
the Committee during the life of the Option. Terms used herein and not
otherwise defined shall be as defined in the Plan.
(h) Governing Law. This Agreement is issued, and the Option evidenced
hereby is granted, in White Plains, New York, and shall be governed
and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York,
excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might
otherwise refer construction or interpretation of this Agreement to
the substantive law of another jurisdiction.
By signing a copy of this Agreement, the Optionee acknowledges that s/he has
received a copy of the Plan, and that s/he has read and understands the Plan and
this Agreement and agrees to the terms and conditions thereof. The Optionee
further acknowledges that the Option awarded pursuant to this Agreement must be
exercised prior to its expiration as set forth herein, that it is the Optionee's
responsibility to exercise the Option within such time period, and that the
Company has no further responsibility to notify the Optionee of the expiration
of the exercise period of the Option.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, or a Vice President, as of the
___ day of ______________.
Agreed to: ITT Industries, Inc.
/s/ Steven R. Loranger
- -----------------------------
Optionee
Dated: _________________ Dated: _________________
Enclosures
Exhibit 10.35
FORM OF 2006 BAND B EMPLOYEE & SG22-23 OPTION AGREEMENT
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC.
2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), effective as of the _____ day of ___________,
by and between ITT Industries, Inc. (the "Company") and [name] (the "Optionee"),
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Optionee is now employed by the Company or an Affiliate (as defined
in the Company's 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of July
13, 2004 (the "Plan")) as an employee, and in recognition of the Optionee's
valued services, the Company, through the Compensation and Personnel Committee
of its Board of Directors (the "Committee"), desires to provide an opportunity
for the Optionee to acquire or enlarge stock ownership in the Company, pursuant
to the provisions of the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement and the provisions of the Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as part of this Agreement, and any administrative rules and
regulations related to the Plan as may be adopted by the Committee, the parties
hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Grant of Options. In accordance with, and subject to, the terms and
conditions of the Plan and this Agreement, the Company hereby confirms the
grant on _____________ (the "Grant Date") to the Optionee of the option to
purchase from the Company all or any part of an aggregate of
___________shares of common stock of the Company (the "Option"), at the
purchase price of $_____ per share (the "Option Price" or "Exercise
Price"). The Option shall be a Nonqualified Stock Option.
2. Terms and Conditions. It is understood and agreed that the Option is
subject to the following terms and conditions:
(a) Expiration Date. The Option shall expire on (seven years from the
grant date), or, if the Optionee's employment terminates before that
date, on the date specified in subsection (e) below.
(b) Exercise of Option. The Option may not be exercised until it has
become vested.
(c) Vesting. Subject to subsections 2(a) and 2(e), the Option shall vest
in three installments as follows:
(i) 1/3 of the Option shall vest on (first anniversary of the grant
date),
(ii) 1/3 of the Option shall vest on (second anniversary of the grant
date), and
(iii) 1/3 of the Option shall vest on (third anniversary of the grant
date);
Subject to subsections 2(a) and 2(e), to the extent not earlier vested
pursuant to paragraphs (i), (ii), and (iii) of this subsection (c),
the Option shall vest in full upon an Acceleration Event (as defined
in the Plan).
(d) Payment of Exercise Price and Tax Withholding. Permissible methods for
payment of the Exercise Price and for satisfaction of tax withholding
obligations upon exercise of the Option shall be as described in
Section 6.6 and Article 14 of the Plan, or, if the Plan is amended,
successor provisions. In addition to the methods of exercise permitted
by Section 6.6 of the Plan, the Optionee may exercise the Option by
way of a broker-assisted cashless exercise in a manner consistent with
the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation T, unless the Committee
determines that such exercise method is prohibited by law.
(e) Effect of Termination of Employment.
If the Optionee's employment terminates before (seven years from the
grant date), the Option shall expire on the date set forth below, as
applicable:
(i) Termination due to Death. If the Optionee's employment is
terminated as a result of the Optionee's death, the Option shall
expire on the earlier of (seven years from the grant date) or the date
three years after the termination of the Optionee's employment due to
death. If all or any portion of the Option is not vested at the time
of the Optionee's termination of employment, the Option shall
immediately become 100% vested.
(ii) Termination due to Disability. If the Optionee's employment is
terminated as a result of the Optionee's Disability (as defined
below), the Option shall expire on the earlier of (seven years from
the grant date) or the date five years after the termination of the
Optionee's employment due to Disability. If all or any portion of the
Option is not vested at the time of the termination of the Optionee's
employment, the Option shall immediately become 100% vested.
(iii) Termination due to Retirement. If the Optionee's employment is
terminated as a result of the Optionee's Retirement (as defined
below), the Option shall expire on the earlier of (seven years from
the grant date) or the date five years after the termination of the
Optionee's employment due to Retirement. If all or any portion of the
Option is not vested at the time of the Optionee's termination of
employment, a prorated portion of the unvested portion of the Option
shall immediately vest as of the date of the termination of employment
(see "Prorated Vesting Upon Retirement" below). Any remaining unvested
portion of the Option shall expire as of the date of the termination
of the Optionee's employment. For purposes of this subsection
2(e)(iii), the Optionee shall be considered employed during any period
in which the Optionee is receiving severance in the form of salary
continuation, and the date of the termination of the Optionee's
employment shall be the last day of any such severance period.
(iv) Voluntary Termination; Cause. If the Optionee's employment is
terminated by the Optionee for any reason other than Retirement,
Disability or death, or by the Company (or an Affiliate, as the
case may be) for cause (as determined by the Committee), the
vested and unvested portions of the Option shall expire on the
date of the termination of the Optionee's employment.
(v) Other Termination by the Company. If the Optionee's employment is
terminated by the Company (or an Affiliate, as the case may be) for
other than cause (as determined by the Committee), and not because of
the Optionee's Retirement, Disability or death, the vested portion of
the Option shall expire on the earlier of (seven years from the grant
date) or the date three months after the termination of the Optionee's
employment. Any portion of the Option that is not vested (or the
entire Option, if no part was vested) as of the date the Optionee's
employment terminates shall expire immediately on the date of
termination of employment, and such unvested portion of the Option
(the entire Option, if no portion was vested on the date of
termination) shall not thereafter be exercisable. For purposes of this
subsection 2(e)(v), the Optionee shall be considered employed during
any period in which the Optionee is receiving severance in the form of
salary continuation, and the date of the termination of the Optionee's
employment shall be the last day of any such severance period.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Optionee's employment is
terminated on or after an Acceleration Event (A) by the Company (or an
Affiliate, as the case may be) for other than cause (as determined by
the Committee), and not because of the Optionee's Retirement,
Disability, or death, or (B) by the Optionee because the Optionee in
good faith believed that as a result of such Acceleration Event he or
she was unable effectively to discharge his or her present duties or
the duties of the position the Optionee occupied just prior to the
occurrence of such Acceleration Event, the Option shall in no event
expire before the earlier of the date that is 7 months after the
Acceleration Event or (seven years from the grant date).
Retirement. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Retirement"
shall mean the termination of the Optionee's employment if, at the
time of such termination, the Optionee is eligible to commence receipt
of retirement benefits under a traditional formula defined benefit
pension plan maintained by the Company or an Affiliate (or would be
eligible to receive such benefits if he or she were a participant in
such traditional formula defined benefit pension plan).
Disability. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Disability"
shall mean the complete and permanent inability of the Optionee to
perform all of his or her duties under the terms of his or her
employment, as determined by the Committee upon the basis of such
evidence, including independent medical reports and data, as the
Committee deems appropriate or necessary.
Prorated Vesting Upon Retirement. The prorated portion of an Option
that vests upon termination of the Optionee's employment due to the
Optionee's Retirement shall be determined by multiplying the total
number of unvested shares subject to the Option at the time of the
termination of the Optionee's employment by a fraction, the numerator
of which is the number of full months the Optionee has been
continually employed since the Grant Date and the
denominator of which is 36. For this purpose, full months of
employment shall be based on monthly anniversaries of the Grant Date,
not calendar months.
(f) Compliance with Laws and Regulations. The Option shall not be
exercised at any time when its exercise or the delivery of shares
hereunder would be in violation of any law, rule, or regulation that
the Company may find to be valid and applicable.
(g) Optionee Bound by Plan and Rules. The Optionee hereby acknowledges
receipt of a copy of the Plan and this Agreement and agrees to be
bound by the terms and provisions thereof. The Optionee agrees to be
bound by any rules and regulations for administering the Plan as may
be adopted by the Committee during the life of the Option. Terms used
herein and not otherwise defined shall be as defined in the Plan.
(h) Governing Law. This Agreement is issued, and the Option evidenced
hereby is granted, in White Plains, New York, and shall be governed
and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York,
excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might
otherwise refer construction or interpretation of this Agreement to
the substantive law of another jurisdiction.
By signing a copy of this Agreement, the Optionee acknowledges that s/he has
received a copy of the Plan, and that s/he has read and understands the Plan and
this Agreement and agrees to the terms and conditions thereof. The Optionee
further acknowledges that the Option awarded pursuant to this Agreement must be
exercised prior to its expiration as set forth herein, that it is the Optionee's
responsibility to exercise the Option within such time period, and that the
Company has no further responsibility to notify the Optionee of the expiration
of the exercise period of the Option.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, or a Vice President, as of the
___ day of ___________.
Agreed to: ITT Industries, Inc.
_____________________________ /s/ Steven R. Loranger
Optionee
Dated: _________________ Dated:
Enclosures
Exhibit 10.36
FORM OF 2006 RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC.
2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOYEES
THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), effective as of the __ day of ___, 2006, by
and between ITT Industries, Inc. (the "Company") and [name] (the "Grantee"),
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantee is now employed by the Company or an Affiliate (as defined
in the Company's 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of July
13, 2004 (the "Plan")) as an employee, and in recognition of the Grantee's
valued services, the Company, through the Compensation and Personnel Committee
of its Board of Directors (the "Committee"), desires to provide an opportunity
for the Grantee to acquire or enlarge stock ownership in the Company, pursuant
to the provisions of the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement and the provisions of the Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as part of this Agreement, and any administrative rules and
regulations related to the Plan as may be adopted by the Committee, the parties
hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Grant of Restricted Stock. In accordance with, and subject to, the terms
and conditions of the Plan and this Agreement, the Company hereby confirms
the grant on ________ (the "Grant Date") to the Grantee of XXXX shares of
Restricted Stock.
2. Terms and Conditions. It is understood and agreed that the shares of
Restricted Stock are subject to the following terms and conditions:
(a) Restrictions. Except as otherwise provided in the Plan and this
Agreement, the Grantee may not sell, assign, pledge, exchange,
transfer, hypothecate or encumber any shares of Restricted Stock
subject to this Award until the Period of Restriction set forth in
subsection 2(c) below shall lapse.
(b) Custody, Dividends and Voting Rights.
(i) As soon as practicable following the grant of Restricted Stock,
the shares of Restricted Stock shall be registered in the
Grantee's name in certificate or book-entry form. If a
certificate is issued, it shall bear an appropriate legend
referring to the restrictions and it shall be held by the
Company, or its agent, on behalf of the Grantee until the Period
of Restriction has lapsed or otherwise been satisfied. If the
shares are registered in book-entry form, the restrictions shall
be placed on the book-entry registration.
(ii) Except for the transfer restrictions, and subject to such other
restrictions, if any, as determined by the Committee, the Grantee
shall have all other rights of a holder of shares, including the
right to receive dividends paid (whether in cash or property)
with respect to the Restricted Stock and the
right to vote (or to execute proxies for voting) such shares.
Unless the Committee determines otherwise, if all or a part of
the dividend in respect of the Restricted Stock is paid in shares
or any other security issued by the Company, such shares or other
securities shall be held by the Company subject to the same
restrictions as the Restricted Stock in respect of which the
dividend is paid.
(c) Lapse of Period of Restriction. Subject to subsection 2(d) below, the
Period of Restriction shall lapse, and shares of Restricted Stock
shall vest and become free of the forfeiture and transfer restrictions
contained in this Agreement on __________, provided the Grantee has
been actively and continuously employed by the Company or an Affiliate
on a full-time basis from the Grant Date through the end of the Period
of Restriction. Upon lapse of the Period of Restriction, the Company
will make arrangements for the form in which the released shares will
be issued to the Grantee.
To the extent not earlier vested pursuant to this subsection (c), the
Period of Restriction shall lapse and shares of Restricted Stock shall
vest in full upon an Acceleration Event (as defined in the Plan).
(d) Effect of Termination of Employment. Except as otherwise provided
below, if the Grantee's employment with the Company and its Affiliates
is terminated for any reason, any shares subject to the Period of
Restriction at the time of such termination event shall be immediately
forfeited.
(i) Termination due to Death or Disability. If the Grantee's
termination of employment is due to death, or Disability (as
defined below), the shares of Restricted Stock shall immediately
become 100% vested and the Period of Restriction shall lapse as
of such termination date.
(ii) Termination due to Retirement or Termination by the Company for
Other than Cause. If the Grantee's termination of employment is
due to Retirement (as defined below) or if the Grantee's
employment is terminated by the Company (or an Affiliate, as the
case may be) for other than cause (as determined by the
Committee), a prorated portion of the shares of Restricted Stock
shall immediately vest as of such termination date (see "Prorated
Vesting Upon Retirement or Termination by the Company for Other
than Cause" below). For purposes of this subsection 2(d)(ii), the
Grantee shall be considered employed during any period in which
the Grantee is receiving severance in the form of salary
continuation, and the date of the termination of the Grantee's
employment shall be the last day of any such severance period.
Retirement. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Retirement"
shall mean the termination of the Grantee's employment if, at the time
of such termination, the Grantee is eligible to commence receipt of
retirement benefits under a traditional formula defined benefit
pension plan maintained by the Company or an Affiliate (or would be
eligible to receive such benefits if he or she were a participant in
such traditional formula defined benefit pension plan).
Disability. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Disability"
shall mean the complete and permanent inability of the Grantee to
perform all of his or her duties under the terms of his or her
employment, as determined by the Committee upon
2
the basis of such evidence, including independent medical reports and
data, as the Committee deems appropriate or necessary.
Prorated Vesting Upon Retirement or Termination by the Company for
Other than Cause. The prorated portion of any unvested shares of
Restricted Stock that vest upon termination of the Grantee's
employment due to Retirement or by the Company for other than cause
shall be determined by multiplying the total number of unvested shares
of Restricted Stock at the time of termination of the Grantee's
employment by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full
months the Grantee has been continually employed since the Grant Date
and the denominator of which is 36. For this purpose, full months of
employment shall be based on monthly anniversaries of the Grant Date,
not calendar months.
(f) Tax Withholding. Permissible methods for satisfaction of tax
withholding obligations upon the lapse of restrictions on shares of
Restricted Stock shall be as described in Article 14 of the Plan, or,
if the Plan is amended, successor provisions.
(g) Grantee Bound by Plan and Rules. The Grantee hereby acknowledges
receipt of a copy of the Plan and this Agreement and agrees to be
bound by the terms and provisions thereof. The Grantee agrees to be
bound by any rules and regulations for administering the Plan as may
be adopted by the Committee prior to the lapse of restrictions on the
shares of Restricted Stock subject to this Agreement. Terms used
herein and not otherwise defined shall be as defined in the Plan.
(h) Governing Law. This Agreement is issued, and the shares of Restricted
Stock evidenced hereby are granted, in White Plains, New York, and
shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of New York, excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or
principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of
this Agreement to the substantive law of another jurisdiction.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, or a Vice President, as of the
____ day of _______.
Agreed to: ITT Industries, Inc.
/s/ Steven R. Loranger
- -----------------------------
Grantee
Dated: _________________ Dated: ________________________
Enclosures
3
EXHIBIT 10.37
FORM OF 2006 NON EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR OPTION AGREEMENT
ITT INDUSTRIES, INC.
2003 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, effective as of the _____ day of _______, by and between ITT
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") and ________________ (the "Optionee"),
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Optionee is now a member of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of
the Company and, in recognition of the Optionee's valued services, the Company
desires to provide an opportunity for the Optionee to acquire or enlarge stock
ownership in the Company pursuant to the provisions of the Company's 2003 Equity
Incentive Plan (the "Plan");
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement and pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, a copy of which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as part of this Agreement, and any
administrative rules and regulations related to the Plan as may be adopted by
the Compensation and Personnel Committee of the Board (the "Committee"), the
parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. GRANT OF OPTIONS. In accordance with, and subject to, the terms and
conditions of the Plan and this Agreement, the Company hereby confirms the
grant on __________ to the Optionee of the option to purchase from the
Company all or any part of an aggregate of _____ shares of common stock of
the Company (the "Option"), at the purchase price of $_____ per share (the
"Exercise Price"). The Option shall be a Nonqualified Stock Option.
2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. It is understood and agreed that the Option is
subject to the following terms and conditions:
(a) EXPIRATION DATE. The Option shall expire on ______, or, if the
Optionee's service on the Board terminates before that date, on the
date specified in subsection (e) below.
(b) EXERCISE OF OPTION. The Option may not be exercised until it has
become vested.
(c) VESTING. Subject to subsections 2(a) and 2(e), the Option shall vest
as follows:
(i) 1/3 of the Option shall vest on _______, the first
anniversary of the grant date
(ii) 1/3 of the Option shall vest on _______, the second of the
grant date anniversary ,and
(iii) 1/3 of the Option shall vest on _________; the third
anniversary of the grant date
Subject to subsections 2(a) and 2(e), to the extent not earlier
vested pursuant to paragraphs (i), (ii), and (iii) of this
subsection (c), the Option shall vest in full upon the first to
occur of the following events:
(A) termination of the Optionee's service on the Board due to
Retirement (as defined below), Disability (as defined below)
or death; or
(B) an Acceleration Event (as defined in the Plan).
(d) PAYMENT OF EXERCISE PRICE. Permissible methods for payment of the
Exercise Price shall be as described in Section 6.6 of the Plan, or,
if the Plan is amended, successor provisions. In addition to the
methods of exercise permitted by Section 6.6 of the Plan, the
Optionee may exercise the Option by way of a broker-assisted
cashless exercise in a manner consistent with the Federal Reserve
Board's Regulation T, unless the Committee determines that such
exercise method is prohibited by law.
(e) EFFECT OF TERMINATION OF BOARD SERVICE.
If the Optionee's service on the Board terminates before (seven
years from the grant date), the Option shall expire on the date set
forth below, as applicable:
(i) Retirement, Disability or Death. If the Optionee's service is
terminated as a result of the Optionee's Retirement,
Disability or death, except as otherwise determined by the
Committee, the Option shall expire on the earlier of
(seven years from the grant date) or the date three years
after the termination of the Optionee's service.
(ii) Cause. If the Optionee's service on the Board is terminated
for cause (as determined by the Committee), the vested and
unvested portions of the Option shall expire on the date of
the termination of the Optionee's service.
RETIREMENT. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Retirement"
shall mean the termination of the Optionee's service on the Board
for any reason other than death, Disability or cause (as determined
by the Committee).
DISABILITY. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Disability"
shall mean the complete and permanent inability of the Optionee to
perform all of his or her duties as a director, as determined by the
Committee upon the basis of such evidence, including independent
medical reports and data, as the Committee deems appropriate or
necessary.
ACCELERATION EVENT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon the
occurrence of an Acceleration Event (as defined in the Plan), the
Option shall be exercisable in full for a period of 60 calendar days
beginning on the date that such Acceleration Event occurs and ending
on the 60th calendar day following that date; provided, however,
that in no event shall the Option be exercisable beyond (seven
years)
(f) COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. The Option shall not be
exercised at any time when its exercise or the delivery of shares
hereunder would be in
violation of any law, rule, or regulation that the Company may find
to be valid and applicable.
(g) OPTIONEE BOUND BY PLAN AND RULES. Optionee hereby acknowledges
receipt of a copy of the Plan and agrees to be bound by the terms
and provisions thereof. Optionee agrees to be bound by any rules and
regulations for administering the Plan as may be adopted by the
Committee during the life of the Option. Terms used herein and not
otherwise defined shall be as defined in the Plan.
This Agreement is issued, and the Option evidenced hereby is granted, in White
Plains, New York, and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of New York.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, or a Vice President, as of the
___ day of __________.
Agreed to: ITT INDUSTRIES, INC.
/s/ Steven R. Loranger
-----------------------
_____________________________
Optionee
Dated: _________________ Dated: ________________
Enclosures
EX-31.1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF STEVEN R. LORANGER PURSUANT TO SEC. 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION
I, Steven R. Loranger, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of ITT
Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
|
|
|
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
|
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
/s/ STEVEN R. LORANGER
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Loranger |
|
Chairman, President and Chief |
|
Executive Officer |
Date: May 10, 2006
44
EX-31.2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF GEORGE E. MINNICH PURSUANT TO SEC. 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION
I, George E. Minnich, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of ITT
Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
|
|
|
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and |
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
|
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and |
|
|
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
/s/ GEORGE E. MINNICH
|
|
|
|
George E. Minnich |
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: May 10, 2006
45
EX-32.1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of ITT Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Steven R. Loranger, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
|
|
|
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and |
|
|
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
/s/ STEVEN R. LORANGER
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Loranger |
|
Chairman, President and |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
May 10, 2006
A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
46
EX-32.2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of ITT Industries, Inc.
(the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, George E. Minnich, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
|
|
|
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and |
|
|
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
/s/ GEORGE E. MINNICH
|
|
|
|
George E. Minnich |
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
May 10, 2006
A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
47